Skip to content
Echoing Green Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Echoing Green Inc

Echoing green discovers emerging leaders and invests deeply in the growth of their ideas.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$2.4MCrime & Legal$2.2MSocial Science$2.0MCommunity Improvement$2.0MHealth$1.8MEducation$1.8MYouth Development$1.7MReligion$1.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $2,640,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,428,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,788,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $400k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLTHI TECHNOLOGIES INC$250,000
EVMATCH INC$250,000
HEALTH IN HER HUE$100,000
CONCONNECT HOLDING CORP$100,000
NEW VOTERS$100,000
SAMI HEALTH$100,000
TRUBEL&CO$100,000
NUTRIBLE INC$100,000
VULVAI$100,000
CENTER FOR BLACK SOUTHERN CULTURE$100,000
HALCYON HOUSE-BLUE FILTER$100,000
SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPREENURS-AI4ABOLITION$100,000
SOUTHERN MOVEMENT COMMITTEE$100,000
FREECAP FINANCIAL$90,000
LOOP CLOSING$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TARJIMLY: $116k → 8%MARIN COUNTRY COOPERATION TEAM: $80k → 8%IFOSTER INC: $10k → 11%ROSA ES ROJO INC: $80k → 8%OAK CLIFF: $90k → 14%TARJIMLY INC: $100k → 16%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $100k → 7%PARITY LAB INC: $80k → 11%BUTTERFLY DREAMZ INC: $18k → 16%MARIN COUNTRY COOP TEAM: $25k → 8%ROSA ES ROJO: $25k → 8%BLACK OUTSIDE INC: $100k → 16%YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $80k → 7%PARITY LAB INC: $25k → 11%FOR OAK CLIFF: $100k → 14%BLACK OUTSIDE INC: $80k → 16%YOU ARE MORE THAN: $25k → 7%BLACK OUTSIDE: $25k → 16%MISSION LAUNCH INC: $43k → 19%MISSION LAUNCH INC: $25k → 19%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $100k → 22%MISSION LAUNCH: $116k → 19%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $25k → 22%TIDES CENTER - ONE GENERATION: $25k → 10%BUILDING OUR NATION'S DAUGHTERS INC: $100k → 19%THE SMILE TRUST INC - DADE COUNTY STREET RESPONSE: $80k → 15%BUILDING OUR NATION'S DAUGHTERS INC: $25k → 19%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $100k → 17%BUILDING OUR NATIONS DAUGHTERS: $10k → 19%THE LIBERATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT (ASAP): $50k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $25k → 17%ACCOUNTABILITY LAB INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.8M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$808k · 46% · 19 grants

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP · FOLLOW-ON FUNDING · FISCAL SPONSORSHIP

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$275k · 16% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP · FOLLOW-ON FUNDING · SIGNAL FUND GRANT

East Asia and the Pacific$200k · 11% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP · FOLLOW-ON FUNDING

South Asia$175k · 10% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP · FOLLOW-ON FUNDING

South America$100k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP

Middle East and North Africa$100k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FELLOWSHIP

Central America and the Caribbean$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FOLLOW-ON FUNDING

North America (Canada and Mexico)$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FOLLOW-ON FUNDING

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 88 repeat orgs$9.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

88 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

88
137

Total granted

$15M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+5%

Still filing today

68%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    Good Call NYC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $241k · revenue +389% · 62% of their budget
  • MC
    Mortar Cincinnati
    3× · 2017–2022 · $235k · revenue +110%
  • TI
    Tarjimly Inc
    2× · 2018–2023 · $216k · revenue +943% · 95% of their budget

Funded once

  • SH
    SUMMER HOUSE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $432k
  • GC
    GOOD CALL TECHNOLOGIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • US
    UNCHAINED STORIES LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $219k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Revolution Institute

Revolution Institute's purpose is to liberate the expansive potential of African-American and Latinx communities through sustainable, future-oriented work, entrepreneurship, and value-aligned collaborations.

Employment
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
Youth Represent Inc

Youth represent uses legal services, policy advocacy, peer education, and other tools to build power and opportunity for black, latine, and other youth of color who the criminal legal system and other systems of oppression harm the most.…

Crime & Legal
5
Represented Leadership Inc

Our mission is to build career pathways for early-stage professionals who are harnessing the power of their leadership through internships professional roles and entrepreneurial opportunities to access a stable well-paid and values-aligned…

Education
6
Rules Foundation

/The Rules is a global network of activists, organizers, designers, coders, researchers, writers and others dedicated to changing the rules that create inequality, climate change, and poverty around the world.

—
7
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
8
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
9
Responsible Innovation Labs Inc

Building infrastructure that helps high-performing startups drive competitive advantage while advancing human flourishing and avoiding downstream harms to people, communities, and planet.

Science & Tech
10
Lead Liberated

Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…

Education
11
Black Alliance for Just Immigration

The organization provides public education on the issues related to fair and just immigration policies.

Arts & Culture
12
National Equity Project

To transform the experiences, outcomes, and life options for children & families who have been historically underserved by our institutions and systems.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Koe Koe Tech Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 248 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

29
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
133/138
Grantees still filing
77/138
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMER HOUSE INSTITUTE: $1,426,564 · OtherSUMMER HOUSE INSTITUTEWELLTHI TECHNOLOGIES INC: $775,000 · OtherEMERGING LEADERS IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING INC: $571,500 · OtherFREECAP FINANCIAL INC: $556,000 · Other+124 more: $12,090,634 · Other+124 moreAppellate Project Inc: $255,000 · EducationAppellate …VILLAGE MICRO FUND: $205,000 · EducationVILLAGE MI…Vocal Justice: $175,000 · EducationVocal Just…COACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $125,000 · EducationCOACHING F…ROOTED SCHOOL: $125,000 · EducationROOTED SCH…Weird Enough Company Inc: $125,000 · EducationWeird Enou…TUJENGE AFRICA FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationTUJENGE AF…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $115,000 · EducationMedha Corp: $100,000 · EducationPILOTED FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationRooted School Foundation: $100,000 · EducationTALKINGPOINTS: $100,000 · EducationTRUBEL&CO: $100,000 · EducationCENTRAL BROOKLYN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $97,500 · EducationLEAP YEAR INC: $95,794 · EducationEducation Bridge: $90,000 · EducationJOY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationEDUCATION FOR ETHIOPIA: $80,000 · Education+2 more: $100,000 · EducationTarjimly Inc: $216,000 · Human ServicesTarjimly …YOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $205,000 · Human ServicesYOU ARE M…BLACK OUTSIDE INC: $205,000 · Human ServicesBLACK OUT…FOR OAK CLIFF: $190,000 · Human ServicesFOR OAK C…Mission Launch Inc: $183,580 · Human ServicesMission L…ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesASYLUM SE…Building Our Nations Daughters Inc: $135,000 · Human ServicesBuilding …TIDES CENTER: $125,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CEN…SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $125,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOA…MCCT: $105,000 · Human ServicesROSA ES ROJO INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesParity Lab Inc: $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE SMILE TRUST: $80,000 · Human Services+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesBuilding Opportunities & Opening Minds: $230,000 · Youth DevelopmentESQ Apprentice Inc: $215,000 · Youth DevelopmentCenter for Black Innovation Inc: $210,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHREAD INC: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentTomorrows Leaders NYC: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentDetroit Heals Detroit Inc: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentHALT VIOLENCE: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentVillage Of Wisdom: $50,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentGood Call NYC: $241,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL LEGAL ADVOCACY NETWORK DBA GLOW: $205,000 · Crime & LegalSUR LEGAL COLLABORATIVE INC: $130,000 · Crime & LegalDC JUSTICE LAB: $130,000 · Crime & LegalCHAINLESS CHANGE INC: $105,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN MOVEMENT COMMITTEE: $100,000 · Crime & LegalINITIATIVE FOR MEDICINES ACCESS & KNOWLEDGE (I-MAK) INC: $100,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $25,000 · Crime & LegalAtutu: $180,000 · Community ImprovementCREATIVE REACTION LAB: $150,000 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER DAYTON UNION COOPERATIVE INITIATIVE INC: $115,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementINNER CITY GREEN TEAM ECONOMIC AND ENVIROMENTAL DEVELOPMENT: $100,000 · Community ImprovementNEW GROWTH INNOVATION NETWORK: $50,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $50,000 · Community ImprovementSANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA: $150,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $125,000 · InternationalFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS: $105,000 · InternationalBUILDING TOMORROW INC: $100,000 · InternationalSWAYAM KRISHI SANGAM FOUNDATION: $86,000 · InternationalSEMBRANDO SENTIDO INC: $80,000 · InternationalMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $25,000 · InternationalIMPACT SOCIETY GLOBAL: $25,000 · InternationalKOE KOE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · International
Other$15,419,698Education$2,293,294Human Services$1,979,580Youth Development$1,335,000Crime & Legal$1,036,000Community Improvement$870,000International$721,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAppellate Project Inc: $255,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetGood Call NYC: $241,000 over 3y, 62% of budgetMortar Cincinnati: $235,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetBuilding Opportunities & Opening Minds: $230,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetTarjimly Inc: $216,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetESQ Apprentice Inc: $215,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetCenter for Black Innovation Inc: $210,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetYOU ARE MORE THAN INC: $205,000 over 3y, 84% of budgetVILLAGE MICRO FUND: $205,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL ADVOCACY NETWORK DBA GLOW: $205,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetL&J EMPOWERMENT INC: $205,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetBLACK OUTSIDE INC: $205,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetFIDEICOMISO DE TIERRAS COMUNITARIAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA SOSTENIBLE: $205,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetFOR OAK CLIFF: $190,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMission Launch Inc: $183,580 over 2y, 77% of budgetAtutu: $180,000 over 4y, 76% of budgetASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC: $175,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPEER DEFENSE PROJECT: $175,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetVocal Justice: $175,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMETRO SOLUTIONS INC: $155,580 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA: $150,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetCREATIVE REACTION LAB: $150,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetCenter for Civic Innovation Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetBuilding Our Nations Daughters Inc: $135,000 over 3y, 82% of budgetRaheem Ai DBA Community Response Works: $135,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetSUR LEGAL COLLABORATIVE INC: $130,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetDC JUSTICE LAB: $130,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetURBAN ASSOCIATION OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS INC: $130,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHREAD INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTomorrows Leaders NYC: $125,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROOTED SCHOOL: $125,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWeird Enough Company Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetSCHOOL JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $125,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTUJENGE AFRICA FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetClimate Defense Project: $116,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetTHE FELLOWSHIP BMEC INC: $116,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER DAYTON UNION COOPERATIVE INITIATIVE INC: $115,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS: $105,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJustice For Housing Inc: $105,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE EQUITY ALLIANCE: $105,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMALIKAH INC FKA INTERNATIONAL MUSLIM WOMENS INITIATIVE FOR SELF EMPOWERMENT: $105,000 over 2y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Appellate Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Good Call NYC ↗
  • Who funds Mortar Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds Building Opportunities & Opening Minds ↗
  • Who funds Tarjimly Inc ↗
  • Who funds ESQ Apprentice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center for Black Innovation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOU ARE MORE THAN INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE MICRO FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL ADVOCACY NETWORK DBA GLOW ↗
  • Who funds L&J EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK OUTSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDEICOMISO DE TIERRAS COMUNITARIAS PARA LA AGRICULTURA SOSTENIBLE ↗
  • Who funds FOR OAK CLIFF ↗
  • Who funds Mission Launch Inc ↗
  • Who funds Atutu ↗
  • Who funds ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEER DEFENSE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Vocal Justice ↗
  • Who funds METRO SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TASSELTURN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds SANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE REACTION LAB ↗
  • Who funds Center for Civic Innovation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Building Our Nations Daughters Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roddenberry Found…Camelback VenturesNew Profit IncNew Schools FundRockefeller Philanthr…FfwdNew Venture FundFocus for Health IncPublic Welfare Founda…The Elevate Prize Fou…Surdna Foundation IncAnnie E Casey Foundat…
The Roddenberry FoundationCA48× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roddenberry Foundation · Camelback Ventures · New Profit Inc · New Schools Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Ffwd · New Venture Fund · Focus for Health Inc · Public Welfare Foundation Inc · The Elevate Prize Foundation Inc · Surdna Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Echoing Green Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Echoing Green Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • You Are More Than Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Justice for Housing Inc: 22% of income from government
  • New Growth Innovation Network: 13% of income from government
  • Thread Inc: 12% of income from government
  • HomeWorks Trenton: 6% of income from government
  • Coaching for Change Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Chainless Change Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 248 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Echoing Green’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home