Skip to content
Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc

The North American Veterinary Community (NAVC) is a nonprofit organization on a mission: to provide world-class continuing professional development for the global veterinary healthcare community.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$449kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kEducation$20k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $170,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $180,623 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,623 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Human Animal Bond Research Institute$75,000
BestyBnB LLC$25,000
The Inner Pup$10,000
American Veterinary Medical Foundation$10,000
Animal Wellness Foundation$10,000
Paws 4 Purpose$10,000
Pasadena Humane$10,000
Texas A&M Veterinary Emergency Team$10,000
Giving Tree$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Pasadena Humane: $10k → 14%Texas A&M Veterinary Emergency Team: $10k → 22%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $83k → 14%Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando: $6k → 11%Humane Society of Tampa Bay: $8k → 13%Pet Sustainability Coalition: $17k → 16%University of Florida Foundation: $10k → 19%BestyBnB LLC: $25k → 15%Pet Peace of Mind: $25k → 14%Giving Tree: $10k → 9%Paws 4 Purpose: $10k → 12%Pet Sustainability Coalition: $25k → 12%American Veterinary Medical Foundation: $10k → 14%The Inner Pup: $10k → 23%Pet Leadership Council: $25k → 14%Texas A&M Foundation: $10k → 22%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $83k → 14%SCPA Florida Adoption Center: $9k → 16%National Association of Veterinary Technician in America: $10k → 14%The Inner Pup: $10k → 23%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $75k → 14%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $75k → 14%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $75k → 14%GlobalGiving Foundation Inc: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
CA
CO
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$472k · 4 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$472k
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+55%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $42k · revenue +9%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +28%
  • TI
    THE INNER PUP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • PL
    Pet Leadership Council
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -100%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -17%
  • PP
    PET PEACE OF MINDgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
The Pet Fund

The Pet Fund pays for veterinary care for those who cannot afford it for low-income individuals and families.

Animals
3
The Pet Care Trust
Animals
4
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
5
Animal Partisan Inc

Animal Partisan, Inc. is organized for the purposes of conducting legal advocacy on behalf of animals subjected to cruelty and exploitation.

Animals
6
The Pet Nutrition Alliance Ltd
Animals
7
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Pet Helpers
Animals
10
The Luving Paws Foundation Inc

Animal rescue and care.

Animals
11
The Animal Welfare Foundation
—
12
Pet Pal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to rescue animals from animal shelters that may otherwise be euthanized due to time limitations, illness, injuries or lack of socialization and training.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pet Leadership Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $390,000 · AnimalsHUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATIONPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION: $41,521 · AnimalsPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITIONPET PEACE OF MIND: $25,000 · AnimalsTHE INNER PUP: $20,000 · Animals+7 more: $62,500 · Animals+7 morePet Leadership Council: $25,000 · OtherPet Leaders…BestyBnB LLC: $25,000 · OtherBestyBnB LL…VETERINARY INDUSTRY GIVING TREE: $10,000 · OtherVETERINARY …National Association of Veterinary Technicians in America Inc: $10,000 · OtherNational As…Texas A&M Foundation: $20,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · International
Animals$539,021Other$70,000Education$30,000International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $390,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION: $41,521 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPet Leadership Council: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET PEACE OF MIND: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNER PUP: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPAWS 4 PURPOSE: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNational Association of Veterinary Technicians in America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Spca Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eastern States Veterinary Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home