Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc

The North American Veterinary Community (NAVC) is a nonprofit organization on a mission: to provide world-class continuing professional development for the global veterinary healthcare community.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182024.

Animals$414kInternational$25kEducation$20kOther$35k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $145,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $155,016 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,016 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Human Animal Bond Research Institute$75,000
Pet Sustainability Coalition$25,000
Pet Peace of Mind$25,000
Texas A&M Foundation$10,000
The Inner Pup$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Pet Leadership Council: $25k → 14%Texas A&M Foundation: $10k → 22%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $83k → 14%Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando: $6k → 11%Humane Society of Tampa Bay: $8k → 13%Pet Sustainability Coalition: $17k → 16%University of Florida Foundation: $10k → 19%Pet Peace of Mind: $25k → 14%Pet Sustainability Coalition: $25k → 12%National Association of Veterinary Technician in America: $10k → 14%The Inner Pup: $10k → 23%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $83k → 14%SCPA Florida Adoption Center: $9k → 16%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $75k → 14%Human Animal Bond Research Institute: $75k → 14%GlobalGiving Foundation Inc: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
OR
CA
CO
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
The Pet Fund

The Pet Fund pays for veterinary care for those who cannot afford it for low-income individuals and families.

Animals
3
The Pet Care Trust
Animals
4
Animal Partisan Inc

Animal Partisan, Inc. is organized for the purposes of conducting legal advocacy on behalf of animals subjected to cruelty and exploitation.

Animals
5
Protectors of Companion Animals Inc D/B/a Snip-It of Central Florida

To provide central florida residents humane solutions to the pet overpopulation problem through low cost spay/neuter services and community education.

Youth Development
6
The Pet Nutrition Alliance Ltd
Animals
7
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
8
Passion for Paws Inc

To provide a sanctuary for senior pets (dogs, cats, farm animals) and to provide access to vet care for indigent people

Animals
9
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
10
Pet Pal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to rescue animals from animal shelters that may otherwise be euthanized due to time limitations, illness, injuries or lack of socialization and training.

11
Pet Partners

Pet partners is the national leader in demonstrating and promoting positive human-animal interactions to improve the physical, emotional and psychological lives of those we serve.

Animals
12
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pet Leadership Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $315,000 · AnimalsHUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATIONPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION — $41,521 · AnimalsPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITIONPET PEACE OF MIND — $25,000 · AnimalsPET PEACE OF MIND+4 more — $32,500 · Animals+4 morePet Leadership Council — $25,000 · OtherNational Association of Veterinary Technicians in America Inc — $10,000 · OtherGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · InternationalTexas A&M Foundation — $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Education
Animals$414,021Other$35,000International$25,000Education$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUMAN ANIMAL BOND RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $315,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION — $41,521 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET PEACE OF MIND — $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetPet Leadership Council — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNational Association of Veterinary Technicians in America Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNER PUP — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSPCA INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Spca Inc0% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph