Skip to content

· Private foundation

East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$380kHealth$189kRecreation & Sports$116kEducation$102kArts & Culture$26kReligion$2kEnvironment$1k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHADASHA FOUNDATION$35,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$30,000
WEST ATHLETIC COUNCIL$10,000
KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS$10,000
1907 FOUNDATION$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATINAHA GOLF TOUR$2,000
HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION$1,500
TN GOLF FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $30k → 14%TN GOLF FOUNDATION: $1k → 4%WEST ATHLETIC COUNCIL: $10k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3k → 13%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%KNOXVILLE YOUTH SPORTS: $3k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3k → 13%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%WEST ATHLETIC COUNCIL: $3k → 12%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%KNOXVILLE YOUTH SPORTS: $3k → 12%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $45k → 10%1907 FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%1907 FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%CHURCH OF THE ASCENCSION: $2k → 12%REMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $20k → 10%KNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 12%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%KNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 12%REMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $20k → 10%KNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 12%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%KNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 12%REMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $20k → 10%KNOX CO BOARD OF EDUCATION: $40k → 12%CHADASHA FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $14k → 12%REMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $10k → 10%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%KNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $10k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in TN; by stated purpose, 77%.

East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$768k · 13 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$768k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+31%

Still filing today

62%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +33%
  • RA
    REMOTE AREA MEDICAL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +69%
  • KM
    KNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2020–2024 · $26k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • KC
    KNOX CO BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE ASCENCSION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • TG
    TENNESSEE GOLF FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Knoxville Academy of Medicine Foundation

To provide no-cost health care to families who have no insurance and do not qualify for the states low income insurance program.

—
3
Knoxville Academy of Medicine

The academy serves as the local medica society for physicians of knox county and surrounding counties in east tennessee. its purpose is to afford a medium for free discussion and exchange of ideas among physicians.

—
4
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
5
Claiborne Medical Center

Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Roane County Medical Center

Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
7
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
10
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
12
Nashville Academy of Medicine and Davidson County Medical Society

The nashville academy of medicine is dedicated to supporting physicians in greater nashville who provide quality medical care and are pledged to uphold high standards of conduct. we promote physician health, practice health, and community…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Chadasha Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHADASHA FOUNDATION INC: $380,000 · InternationalCHADASHA FOUNDATION INCREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $70,000 · InternationalREMOTE AREA MEDICALKNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $93,500 · OtherKNOXVILLE YOUTH ATHLETICSKNOX CO BOARD OF EDUCATION: $40,000 · OtherKNOX CO BOARD OF EDUCATIONUT FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherUT FOUNDATIONWEST ATHLETIC COUNCIL: $13,000 · OtherWEST ATHLETIC COUNCIL+6 more: $13,407 · Other+6 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $95,800 · HealthAmerican Heart …HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $9,550 · HealthHELEN ROSS MCNA…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $700 · HealthVanderbilt University: $30,000 · EducationKNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $26,000 · Arts & CultureTENNESSEE GOLF FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureKNOX YOUTH SPORTS INC: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · Environment
International$450,000Other$191,907Health$111,050Education$30,000Arts & Culture$27,000Recreation & Sports$5,500Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHADASHA FOUNDATION INC: $380,000 over 9y, 40% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $95,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetVanderbilt University: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $26,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION: $9,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKNOX YOUTH SPORTS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE GOLF FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN ROSS MCNABB CENTER INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHADASHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds KNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds HELEN ROSS MCNABB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KNOX YOUTH SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HELEN ROSS MCNABB CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Clayton Family FoundationTN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Clayton Family Foundation · Haslam Family Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on East Tennessee Cardiovascular Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph