Skip to content
East 66th Street Services Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

East 66th Street Services Inc

East 66th street services, inc.

$608k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$325kReligion$132kArts & Culture$106kHousing & Shelter$105kYouth Development$93kHuman Services$92kFood & Nutrition$92kPublic Benefit$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $117,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $607,927 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $490,677 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $111k
$36,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JARDIN 4 LIFE$39,750
ELEMENTS OF INTERNAL MOVEMENT$36,500
FOOD DEPOT TO HEALTH INCORPORATED$35,000
CJ'S FAMOUS ANGUS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%EAST END NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 17%ORGANIZE OHIO: $6k → 17%AFRICA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $26k → 17%AFRICA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $9k → 17%HELPING HANDS DEVELOPMENT CORP: $8k → 17%HENRY JOHNSON CENTER INC: $8k → 17%GARFIELD HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7k → 17%TBP ORGANIZATION: $9k → 17%ANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO: $9k → 17%ANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$569k · 15 repeat orgs$751k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
76

Total granted

$569k
$710k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IN OUR BACKYARDS INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $62k · revenue +75%
  • FF
    FAMICOS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +162%
  • MW
    METRO WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • I
    IOBY
    one grant, 2021 · $55k
  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE OUTREACH AND DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • CO
    Cleveland Ownsgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westown Community Development Corp

Provide services to its residents, business owners and stakeholders that enhance and maintain the westown neighborhoods and businesses. wcdc's service area known as westown is a vibrant, historic and culturally diverse city neighborhood…

Community Improvement
2
New City Cleveland

Empowering a neighborhood through programs and services for the Buckeye Woodhill residents.

Community Improvement
3
Cleveland Freedom Project

Youth-led Cultivators

Youth Development
4
East Dayton Neighborhood Development Corporation

The East Dayton Neighborhood Development Corporation EDNDC exists to expand access to safe decent and affordable housing while improving neighborhood amenities in Twin Towers. Our work is focused on creating lasting social economic and…

Housing & Shelter
5
Neighborhood Progress Inc

Cleveland neighborhood progress is committed to advancing its mission of fostering communities of choice and opportunity. our vision is for all of cleveland's neighborhoods to be attractive, vibrant communities where people from all…

Community Improvement
6
Madison Community Improvement Corpo

To advance, encourage, and promote industrial, economic, and civic development in the community of madison, ohio.

Community Improvement
7
Buckeye Shaker Square Development Corporation

Neighborhood development

Community Improvement
8
Uptown Partners of Pittsburgh

Uptown partners is a community-based organization of residents, institutions, and business owners-working together to build a vibrant uptown community.

Community Improvement
9
Cleveland Citywide Development Corporation

CCDCs purpose is to review and process grants, loans, tax incremental financing and provide other assistance to eligible businesses/others within the city of Cleveland. This assistance is designed to promote economic growth and to retain…

Community Improvement
10
New Kensington Community Development Corp

NKCDC advances social equity and economic empowerment by nurturing and creating opportunities for neighbors to live in, and actively shape, their neighborhoods of choice. (See Schedule O)

—
11
Undivided Cleveland

Lead based abatement in urban housing, youth skill and educational enhancement.

Environment
12
Ohio Business Leadership Network
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Clair Superior Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Recess Cleveland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/47
Grantees still filing
23/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JARDIN 4 LIFE: $64,750 · OtherJARDIN 4 LIFEIOBY: $55,000 · OtherIOBYELEMENTS OF INTERNAL MOVEMENT: $42,990 · OtherELEMENTS OF INTERNAL MOVEMENTFOOD DEPOT TO HEALTH INCORPORATED: $35,000 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE OUTREACH AND DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES: $24,921 · OtherGARDENING IN THE DISTRICT NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION: $24,560 · Other+51 more: $451,859 · Other+51 moreSLAVIC VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT: $60,784 · Community ImprovementSLAVIC VILLAGE DEV…NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $33,519 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD LEADE…METRO WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $30,179 · Community ImprovementMETRO WEST COMMUNI…NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC: $29,545 · Community ImprovementNORTHWEST NEIGHBOR…Cleveland Owns: $22,000 · Community ImprovementCleveland OwnsJEFFERSON-PURITAS WEST PARK CDC: $9,861 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $9,703 · Community ImprovementOHIO CITY INCORPORATED: $8,402 · Community ImprovementREPAIR THE WORLD: $8,000 · Community ImprovementBURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT INC: $65,607 · Housing & ShelterBURTEN BELL …FAMICOS FOUNDATION: $59,739 · Housing & ShelterFAMICOS FOUN…WESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterWESTERN RESE…AFRICAHOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $34,500 · Human ServicesANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO: $15,767 · Human ServicesTBP ORGANIZATION: $8,544 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesHenry Johnson Center Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesGARFIELD HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,400 · Human ServicesORGANIZE OHIO INC: $5,700 · Human ServicesEAST END NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $5,482 · Human ServicesIN OUR BACKYARDS INC: $62,000 · EducationSUMMER ON THE CUYAHOGA: $9,500 · EducationHASANI MANAGEMENT INC: $8,200 · EducationTHE LD EDGE NETWORK: $8,150 · EducationJAMOCHA ARTS CENTER: $14,930 · Arts & CultureASSOCIATION FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL GAR: $7,500 · Arts & CultureThe Land Cle: $7,000 · Arts & CulturePraxis Integrated Fiber Workshop: $6,985 · Arts & CultureEAST CLEVELAND FARMERS MARKET PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $6,700 · Arts & CultureOH SEW POWERFUL INC: $6,000 · Arts & Culture99TREASURES ARTS & CULTURE: $5,575 · Arts & CultureWATERLOO ARTS: $5,500 · Arts & CultureDJAPO CULTURAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $5,200 · Arts & Culture1000 TIES: $9,830 · Youth DevelopmentMotivated and Empowered Inc: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentRECESS CLEVELAND: $5,500 · Youth Development
Other$699,080Community Improvement$211,993Housing & Shelter$140,346Human Services$92,893Education$87,850Arts & Culture$65,390Youth Development$22,330

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT INC: $65,607 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetIN OUR BACKYARDS INC: $62,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSLAVIC VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT: $60,784 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFAMICOS FOUNDATION: $59,739 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $33,519 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC: $29,545 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCleveland Owns: $22,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO: $15,767 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNortheast Ohio Alliance for Hope: $12,500 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetDRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTeaching Young Women in Society Truth: $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetJEFFERSON-PURITAS WEST PARK CDC: $9,861 over 1y, 0.9% of budget1000 TIES: $9,830 over 1y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED: $9,703 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER ON THE CUYAHOGA: $9,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTBP ORGANIZATION: $8,544 over 1y, 85% of budgetOHIO CITY INCORPORATED: $8,402 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPCYCLE PARTS SHOP: $8,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL GAR: $7,500 over 1y, 27% of budgetGARFIELD HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,400 over 1y, 16% of budgetMOUNT PLEASANT NOW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,150 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetED KEATING CENTER INC: $7,100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Land Cle: $7,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPraxis Integrated Fiber Workshop: $6,985 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCAMPUS DISTRICT INC: $6,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOH SEW POWERFUL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetWATERLOO ARTS: $5,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetST CLAIR SUPERIOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,500 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetRECESS CLEVELAND: $5,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDJAPO CULTURAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $5,200 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds IN OUR BACKYARDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SLAVIC VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FAMICOS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAHOUSE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds METRO WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC ↗
  • Who funds Cleveland Owns ↗
  • Who funds ANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE REVITALIZATION AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMOCHA ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Northeast Ohio Alliance for Hope ↗
  • Who funds DRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC ↗
  • Who funds Teaching Young Women in Society Truth ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON-PURITAS WEST PARK CDC ↗
  • Who funds 1000 TIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER ON THE CUYAHOGA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The Char and Chuck Fo…Saint Lukes Foundatio…The George Gund Found…Neighborhood Progress…Shoes and Clothes for…Medwish MedworksIn Our Backyards IncJack Joseph & Morton …Third Federal Foundat…The McGregor Foundati…Sisters of Charity Fo…
The Cleveland FoundationOH75.8× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · The George Gund Foundation · Neighborhood Progress Inc · Shoes and Clothes for Kids · Medwish Medworks · In Our Backyards Inc · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · Third Federal Foundation · The McGregor Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization East 66th Street Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from East 66th Street Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to East 66th Street Services Inc?

    Find your warmest path to East 66th Street Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on East 66th Street Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home