Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Early Learning Coalition of the Nature Coast Inc

The coalition will collaborate with parents to integrate a system of services and facilitate quality early education programs that include linkages to all areas of child development.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 88% of EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF THE NATURE COAST INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 44 grants below total $941,298 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,799,216 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,857,918 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $772k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $109k
$20,122
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL ABOUT KIDS LLC$58,240
KID'S N COMPANY OF WILLISTON INC$51,171
RR GAGE ENTERPRISES INC$43,286
THE VILLAGES EARLY LEARNING COMPANY$43,060
YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST$43,016
AMERICA'S ANGELS INC$37,046
THE KEYS TO KNOWLEDGE LEARNING ACAD$32,243
NANNA'S PLACE OF BRONSON INC$30,359
AMAZING GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH INC$29,978
NATURE COAST PRESCHOOL INC$29,644
C R P S INC$26,097
TWO BY TWO LEARNING CENTER INC$25,701
WEE CARE DAY CARE INC$25,104
COLE T INC$24,317
T COLE INC$23,508
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EPISCOPAL CHILDRENS SERVICES: $59k → 14%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST: $668k → 17%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST: $520k → 17%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST: $360k → 17%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST: $43k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 57 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
10

Total granted

$17M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-30%

Still filing today

4%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +6%
  • KN
    KID'S N COMPANY OF WILLISTON INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $893k
  • AA
    ALL ABOUT KIDS LLC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $847k

Funded once

  • TS
    TEACHING STRATEGIES LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $91k
  • EC
    EPISCOPAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $59k · revenue -30%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS EARLY LEARNING
    one grant, 2023 · $51k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KID'S N COMPANY OF WILLISTON INC — $893,103 · OtherKID'S N COMPANY OF WILLISTON INCALL ABOUT KIDS LLC — $846,669 · OtherALL ABOUT KIDS LLCTHE VILLAGES EARLY LEARNING COMPANY — $832,626 · OtherTHE VILLAGES EARLY LEARNING COMPANY+63 more — $12,927,314 · Other+63 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC — $1,591,169 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'…EPISCOPAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $59,138 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CITRUS COUNT — $520,322 · Youth Development
Other$15,499,712Human Services$1,650,307Youth Development$520,322

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC — $1,591,169 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CITRUS COUNT — $520,322 over 3y, 13% of budgetLEVY COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $129,088 over 2y, 57% of budgetEPISCOPAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $59,138 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SUNCOAST INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CITRUS COUNT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Suncoast Credit Union FoundationFL15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Early Learning Coalition of the Nature Coast Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 42%
  • Episcopal Children's Services Inc42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph