Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl W Jr and Terri Youngmeyer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$138k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$443kEducation$441kCivil Rights$193kHealth$11kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$10kAnimals$6kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $138k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT USA$137,500
WOMEN OF FAMILIES AND FREEDOM$12,750
CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY$5,000
ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC$4,000
FRONTIERS USA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEAUMONT COMMUNITY ASSOC: $3k → 8%BEAUMONT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $1k → 8%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $5k → 11%BEAUMONT COMMUNITY ASSOC: $1k → 8%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $1k → 11%HOPE RESPONSE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
CA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+175%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $438k · revenue +43%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +66%
  • MP
    MAGGIE'S PLACE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MM
    MOUNTAIN MEADOWS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • WA
    WILD AT HEART INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +214%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Arizona Policy Action

Center for arizona policy action educates arizona citizens on public policy issues pertaining to sanctity of life, marriage, the family, and religious freedom, and encourages civic engagement.

Civil Rights
2
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona

The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…

—
3
Family Policy Alliance

Family policy alliance is a family advocacy organization that inspires men and women to live out biblical citizenship that transforms culture. we provide resources that equip citizens to make their voices heard on critical social policy…

Human Services
4
Family Policy Alliance Foundation

We inspire and educate biblical citizens, equip statesmen, and serve a national alliance.

Public Benefit
5
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
6
Media Matters for America

Dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the u.s. media.

Education
7
Make Elections Fair Inc

Advocacy and passage of initiatives to eliminate the partisan primary to allow all voters to vote in the primary for any candidate.

—
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
10
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
11
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
12
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WSU FOUNDATION: $440,652 · OtherWSU FOUNDATIONTURNING POINT USA INC: $437,500 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCWOMEN OF FAMILIES AND FREEDOM: $52,750 · OtherWOMEN OF FAMILIES AND FREEDOM+11 more: $38,660 · OtherCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $135,000 · EducationCENTER FOR AR…MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesBEAUMONT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesHOPE RESPONSE INC: $500 · Human ServicesWILD AT HEART INC: $5,000 · AnimalsFAMILY MATTERS INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CultureMIO Frontiers: $2,000 · Religion
Other$969,562Education$135,000Human Services$11,000Animals$5,000Community Improvement$5,000Arts & Culture$4,500Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $437,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $135,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILD AT HEART INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBEAUMONT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE RESPONSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRONG COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD AT HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds HOPE RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STRONG COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl W Jr and Terri Youngmeyer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl W Jr and Terri Youngmeyer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl W Jr and Terri Youngmeyer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph