Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl S McDaniel Jr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$95kHuman Services$29kArts & Culture$23kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$20kHousing & Shelter$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
YMCA OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $1k → 14%HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $1k → 14%HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $1k → 14%HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $1k → 14%HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
PA
CA
KY
MD
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$301k · 11 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$301k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+31%

Still filing today

45%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue +191%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +86%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • TW
    TEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community General Hospital Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
2
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
3
New Hanover Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
4
Presbyterian Hospital Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
5
The Nash Avery Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Charlotte Ballet

Charlotte ballet's mission: through dance, we create authentic connections, engaging and inclusive educational opportunities, and transformative experiences. charlotte ballet's vision: we inspire individuals and communities to explore the…

Arts & Culture
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Inc

The mission is to cure cystic fibrosis and to provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives.

Science & Tech
8
Cincinnati Development Fund

To strengthen underserved neighborhoods and improve lives through innovative financing.

Housing & Shelter
9
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
10
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
11
Margaret Hackett Family Center Nfp

The margaret hackett family center is designed to help families find the critical medical care for their children who have rare congenital conditions affecting the central nervous system. congenital conditions affecting the central nervous…

Health
12
The Chicago Community Trust

Building on 100 years of commitment to the Chicago region, The Chicago Community Trust mobilizes people, ideas, organizations and resources to advance opportunity for all Chicagoans.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hands to Hands Community Fund; the most unlike its peers is Helping Hands of Trigg County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPINELAND COLLEGE - EDWARDS MILITARY INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherPINELAND COLLEGE - EDWARDS MILITARY INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANANASH COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $20,000 · OtherNASH COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDNYMCA OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA: $13,500 · OtherYMCA OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANATEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUND: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $10,500 · OtherNASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyNASH COMMUNITY COLL…NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH CAROLINA COMM…HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHANDS TO HANDS COMM…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthEVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $2,500 · Arts & CultureBLUE 13 DANCE COMPANY INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$244,000Philanthropy$65,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Health$20,000Arts & Culture$15,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE 13 DANCE COMPANY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL ↗
  • Who funds HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF TRIGG COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BLUE 13 DANCE COMPANY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl S McDaniel Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl S McDaniel Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl S McDaniel Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph