Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$18kEducation$17kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$14kPhilanthropy$11kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$7kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$339k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$3,000
GRANDMA'S HOUSE$3,000
NODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC$2,500
SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC$2,000
CLARINDA ATHLETIC CLUB INC$2,000
CLARINDA LIED CENTER$1,500
SOUTHWEST IOWA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
NODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY$1,000
LIED PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TREES FOREVER INC: $1k → 9%CLARINDA FOUNDATION: $11k → 13%GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY: $5k → 13%CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $3k → 13%GRANDMA'S HOUSE: $3k → 13%CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $3k → 13%SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC: $3k → 13%AMERICAN LEGION: $3k → 13%GRANDMA'S HOUSE: $3k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC: $3k → 13%CLARINDA ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $3k → 13%CLARINDA LIED CENTER: $2k → 13%CLARINDA AREA VOLUNTEERS: $2k → 13%CLARINDA ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $2k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2k → 13%GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY: $2k → 13%CLARINDA ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $2k → 13%SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC: $2k → 13%CLARINDA AREA VOLUNTEERS: $2k → 13%SOUTHWEST IOWA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC: $2k → 13%CLARINDA ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $2k → 13%LIED PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2k → 13%CLARINDA LIED CENTER: $2k → 13%CLARINDA LIED CENTER: $2k → 13%CLARINDA AREA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC: $1k → 13%GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY: $1k → 13%CLARINDA LIED CENTER: $1k → 13%SOUTHWEST IOWA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC: $1k → 13%CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1k → 13%CLARINDA AREA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 13%LIED PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 13%GRANDMA'S HOUSE: $1k → 13%CLARINDA ATHLETIC CLUB INC: $1k → 13%GRANDMA'S HOUSE: $1k → 13%LIED PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 13%CLARINDA AREA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 13%LIED PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 13%CLARINDA LIED CENTER: $1k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 13%GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY: $1k → 13%NODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 13%CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1k → 13%CLARINDA AREA VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 13%CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1k → 13%LIED PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 11 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$85k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

27%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k
  • CI
    CLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +372%
  • CC
    CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CF
    CLARINDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • TF
    TREES FOREVER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETY: $10,900 · OtherGLENN MILLER BIRTHPLACE SOCIETYCLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $9,900 · OtherCLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEGRANDMA'S HOUSE: $9,900 · OtherGRANDMA'S HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $8,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLARINDA LIED CENTER: $7,900 · OtherCLARINDA LIED CENTERLIED PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6,900 · OtherLIED PUBLIC LIBRARYNODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC INC: $6,550 · OtherNODAWAY VALLEY FREE CLINIC INCNODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $4,900 · OtherNODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETYSOUTHWEST IOWA HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,500 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION: $3,000 · OtherCLARINDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,700 · PhilanthropyCLARINDA FOU…CLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC: $10,400 · Recreation & SportsCLARINDA IO…SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC: $6,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN EXCEPTIONAL CARE: $900 · HealthTREES FOREVER INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$71,500Philanthropy$10,700Recreation & Sports$10,400Health$6,900Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLARINDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,700 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC: $10,400 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetCLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $9,900 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTREES FOREVER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN EXCEPTIONAL CARE: $900 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLARINDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARINDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOREVER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN EXCEPTIONAL CARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lisle Charitable FoundationIA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lisle Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc?

    Find your warmest path to Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph