Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lisle Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$24kEducation$15kHealth$9kHuman Services$7kEmployment$4kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$525
Median grant
3
States reached
$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARINDA FOUNDATION$5,500
WACOSA$1,500
UNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION$525
CLARINDA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$500
IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE - SPIRITS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS$250
NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW MARKET FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%GRANDMA'S HOUSE DAYCARE: $1k → 13%GRANDMA'S HOUSE DAYCARE: $800 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52k · 10 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$52k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+98%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WACOSA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +17%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +136%
  • GH
    GRANDMAS HOUSE DAYCARE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CK
    CLARINDA KIWANIS CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • NV
    NODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clarinda Chamber of Commerce

City and area economic development

2
Clear Lake Development Foundation

To further the development of Clear Lake, IA and the surrounding area for its citizens.

3
Clarinda Economic Development Corp

Economic development of city of clarinda

Community Improvement
4
Iowa Automobile Dealers Foundation for Education

To invest in the future of the motor vehicle sales and service industry by awarding automotive scholarships. To develop programs and incentives with high schools, colleges, educational agencies, and the public to encourage automotive…

Education
5
Clarinda Country Club

Membership golf course

6
Agribusiness Association of Iowa

The agribusiness association of iowa exists to advocate communicate and educate on behalf of a professional agribusiness industry.

7
Credit Union Association of the Dakotas

The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.

8
Midwest Auto Care Alliance

To promote the interests of the automotive service industry in missouri, kansas, iowa, nebraska, arkansas and oklahoma

9
Iowa Automotive Heritage Foundation
Science & Tech
10
Colorado Automobile Dealers Association

The association facilitates communication, encourages sound business practices, develops constructive community and governmental relationships and promotes sound public relations with and among the automobile dealerships of colorado.

11
Western Iowa Development Assoc

Facilitate economic opportunity, business success, community engagement, prosperity, and quality of life for rural western iowa

12
Community Foundation for Western Iowa

The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clarinda Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Market Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLARINDA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $8,250 · OtherCLARINDA COMMUNITY SCHOOLSPARTNERS IN EXCEPTIONAL CARE (CRHC) — $7,500 · OtherPARTNERS IN EXCEPTIONAL CARE (CRHC)Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLARINDA KIWANIS CLUB — $5,000 · OtherCLARINDA KIWANIS CLUBWACOSA — $4,000 · OtherWACOSAIOWA ABI FOUNDATION — $3,250 · OtherIOWA ABI FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION — $2,850 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATIONNODAWAY VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE - SPIRITS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS — $1,950 · Other+12 more — $5,964 · Other+12 moreCLARINDA FOUNDATION INC — $20,600 · PhilanthropyCLARINDA FOUNDATION INCGRANDMAS HOUSE DAYCARE — $1,800 · Human ServicesNEW MARKET FOUNDATION — $500 · Human ServicesCLARINDA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC — $750 · Recreation & Sports
Other$47,764Philanthropy$20,600Human Services$2,300Recreation & Sports$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLARINDA FOUNDATION INC — $20,600 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetWACOSA — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION — $2,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRANDMAS HOUSE DAYCARE — $1,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC — $750 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNEW MARKET FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLARINDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WACOSA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE AFTERMARKET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GRANDMAS HOUSE DAYCARE
  • Who funds CLARINDA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CLARINDA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB INC
  • Who funds CLARINDA IOWA A'S BASEBALL INC
  • Who funds NEW MARKET FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek PlcIA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earl N and Mabel Bragg Bossingham Foundation Co Willson & Pechacek Plc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lisle Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lisle Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lisle Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph