Skip to content
EAH Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

EAH Inc

To provide low-income housing.

$999k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$558k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$3.9MHealth$921kEducation$85kCommunity Improvement$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$7k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $930,267, the rows itemized in this filing. The $998,945 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $68,678 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $288k
  • $250k+1 grant · $558k
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$307M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rodeo Senior Apartments Inc$558,188
Hui Kauhale Inc$127,811
Golden Oak Manor Inc$85,000
Sonoma County Affordable Homes Inc$75,000
Kahului Town Terrace$36,809
EAH Community Housing Inc$26,049
EAH - Contra Costa Inc$15,410
Los Robles Apartments Inc$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Rodeo Senior Apartments Inc: $558k → 8%POINTE ON VERMONT A2Z ENT LLC: $171k → 14%PALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC: $443k → 8%HUI KAUHALE INC: $387k → 9%EAH - CONTRA COSTA INC: $350k → 8%HUI KAUHALE INC: $278k → 9%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $187k → 8%Hui Kauhale Inc: $128k → 9%HUI KAUHALE INC: $175k → 8%HUI KAUHALE INC: $106k → 9%EAH - CONTRA COSTA INC: $142k → 8%HUI KAUHALE INC: $40k → 9%HUI KAUHALE INC: $109k → 8%Kahului Town Terrace: $37k → 9%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $100k → 8%KAHULUI TOWN TERRACE: $15k → 9%EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $90k → 8%EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $90k → 8%Golden Oak Manor Inc: $85k → 8%EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $80k → 8%Sonoma County Affordable Homes Inc: $75k → 8%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $72k → 8%EAH - CONTRA COSTA INC: $67k → 8%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $63k → 8%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $62k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $60k → 8%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $60k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $60k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $60k → 8%FOUNTAIN WEST APARTMENTS INC: $51k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $50k → 8%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $45k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $44k → 8%EAH - CONTRA COSTA INC: $43k → 8%PALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC: $42k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $41k → 8%GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $40k → 8%3706 SAN PABLO EMERYVILLE LP: $40k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $40k → 8%PALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC: $34k → 8%DUBLIN TRANSIT EAH INC: $31k → 8%CATHEDRAL GARDENS OAKLAND LP: $31k → 8%EAH Community Housing Inc: $26k → 8%SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG: $21k → 8%LOS ROBLES APARTMENTS INC: $21k → 8%EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $21k → 8%3706 SAN PABLO EMERYVILLE LP: $16k → 8%EAH - Contra Costa Inc: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 11 repeat orgs$876k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$4.0M
$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+10%

Still filing today

82%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $558k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CECILIA PLACE HOMES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $639k · revenue +30% · 39% of their budget
  • EC
    EAH-CONTRA COSTA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $617k · revenue +6%
  • PC
    PALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $520k · revenue +34% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • PO
    POINTE ON VERMONT A2Z ENT LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $171k
  • FW
    FOUNTAIN WEST APARTMENTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $51k · revenue +34%
  • DT
    DUBLIN TRANSIT EAH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $31k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eah-Contra Costa Inc

To perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of eah inc., a california nonprofit public benefit corporation, the supported organization. eah inc's mission is to provide low-income housing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Eah Inc

To provide low-income housing.

Housing & Shelter
3
Arbor Court Inc

The corporation was organized to provide persons with physical disabilities with housing facilities on a nonprofit basis pursuant to section 811 of the national affordable housing act of 1990.

Human Services
4
Kalani Mala Inc

To perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of eah inc., a related california nonprofit public benefit corporation.

Housing & Shelter
5
Los Robles Apartments Inc

To perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of eah inc., a related california nonprofit public benefit corporation.

Housing & Shelter
6
Satellite Senior Homes Ii Inc

To provide affordable rental housing for low and moderate-income elderly persons.

Housing & Shelter
7
San Rafael Rotary Manor

To provide elderly persons of modest means with housing facilities and services specially designed to meet their physical, social and psychological needs and to promote their health, security, happiness, and usefulness, the charges for…

Housing & Shelter
8
Satellite Affordable Housing Associates Property Management

To benefit and support Satellite Affordable Housing Associates in carrying out its purposes by providing management and related services to its affiliates, all of which are California non-profit public benefit corporations organized to…

—
9
Mission Housing Dev Prop Iii Inc

To provide low-income housing

Housing & Shelter
10
East Bay Housing Organizations

East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) is a member-driven organization working to create, preserve, and protect affordable housing opportunities for low-income communities by advocating, organizing, educating, and building coalitions. EBHO…

Housing & Shelter
11
Buckelew Housing Inc

To provide mentally ill persons with housing facilities and services.

Housing & Shelter
12
Eah Community Housing Inc

The express purpose of the corporation shall include expanding the opportunitiesavailable to low and moderate income persons to obtain affordable, decent, safeand sanitary housing in the city of los angeles; providing such housing…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midtown Homes Inc; the most unlike its peers is HomeAid Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUI KAUHALE INC: $1,222,173 · Housing & ShelterHUI KAUHALE INCEAH-CONTRA COSTA INC: $617,235 · Housing & ShelterEAH-CONTRA COSTA INCRodeo Senior Apartments Inc: $558,188 · Housing & ShelterRodeo Senior Apartments IncPALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC: $519,725 · Housing & ShelterPALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INCEAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $306,724 · Housing & ShelterEAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC+7 more: $142,133 · Housing & ShelterSONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOMES INC: $451,575 · OtherSONOMA COUNTY AFFO…POINTE ON VERMONT A2Z ENT LLC: $170,625 · OtherPOINTE ON VERMONT …3706 SAN PABLO EMERYVILLE LP: $70,765 · Other3706 SAN PABLO EME…Kahului Town Terrace: $65,055 · OtherKahului Town Terra…CATHEDRAL GARDENS OAKLAND LP: $30,531 · OtherCECILIA PLACE HOMES INC: $638,887 · EducationCECILIA PLACE HO…GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $84,572 · EducationGOLDEN OAK MANOR…CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $7,000 · Philanthropy
Housing & Shelter$3,366,178Other$788,551Education$723,459Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUI KAUHALE INC: $1,222,173 over 7y, 63% of budgetCECILIA PLACE HOMES INC: $638,887 over 8y, 39% of budgetEAH-CONTRA COSTA INC: $617,235 over 5y, 15% of budgetRodeo Senior Apartments Inc: $558,188 over 1y, 85% of budgetPALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC: $519,725 over 3y, 100% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOMES INC: $451,575 over 9y, 18% of budgetEAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $306,724 over 5y, 100% of budgetGOLDEN OAK MANOR INC: $84,572 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFOUNTAIN WEST APARTMENTS INC: $50,580 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetDUBLIN TRANSIT EAH INC: $31,285 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetLos Robles Apartments Inc: $27,200 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetHomeAid Hawaii: $15,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDTOWN HOMES INC: $7,185 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKalani Mala Inc: $5,523 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTHREE OAKS FAMILY HOMES INC: $5,360 over 1y, 8.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization EAH Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from EAH Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on EAH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home