· Public charity
EAH Inc
To provide low-income housing.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $930,267 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $998,945 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $68,678 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $288k
- $250k+1 grant · $558k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Rodeo Senior Apartments Inc | $558,188 |
| Hui Kauhale Inc | $127,811 |
| Golden Oak Manor Inc | $85,000 |
| Sonoma County Affordable Homes Inc | $75,000 |
| Kahului Town Terrace | $36,809 |
| EAH Community Housing Inc | $26,049 |
| EAH - Contra Costa Inc | $15,410 |
| Los Robles Apartments Inc | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $558k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCECILIA PLACE HOMES INC8× · 2018–2025 · $639k · revenue +30% · 39% of their budget
- ECEAH-CONTRA COSTA INC5× · 2021–2025 · $617k · revenue +6%
- PCPALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC3× · 2018–2022 · $520k · revenue +34% · 100% of their budget
Funded once
- POPOINTE ON VERMONT A2Z ENT LLCone grant, 2024 · $171k
- FWFOUNTAIN WEST APARTMENTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $51k · revenue +34%
- DTDUBLIN TRANSIT EAH INCone grant, 2019 · $31k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The corporation was organized to provide persons with physical disabilities with housing facilities on a nonprofit basis pursuant to section 811 of the national affordable housing act of 1990.
To provide low-income housing.
To benefit and support Satellite Affordable Housing Associates in carrying out its purposes by providing management and related services to its affiliates, all of which are California non-profit public benefit corporations organized to…
To provide affordable rental housing for low and moderate-income elderly persons.
East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) is a member-driven organization working to create, preserve, and protect affordable housing opportunities for low-income communities by advocating, organizing, educating, and building coalitions. EBHO…
To provide low-income housing
To provide elderly persons of modest means with housing facilities and services specially designed to meet their physical, social and psychological needs and to promote their health, security, happiness, and usefulness, the charges for…
To provide mentally ill persons with housing facilities and services.
To benefit and support mission housing development corporation, a california nonprofit public benefit corporation, and its purposes in accordance with section 509(a)(3) of the internal revenue code by (i)providing decent, safe and sanitary…
Echo park senior citizen housing corporation, a california nonprofit corporation was formed to own a 41-unit rental housing project for the very low income elderly located in los angeles, california. the operations of the project began in…
To benefit and support Human Investment Project, Inc., a related California nonprofit public benefit corporation, and its exempt purpose of improving housing and lives of people in its community.
Menorah housing foundation (mhf) is a california not-for-profit corporation which sponsors and manages, through affiliated entities, affordable housing for senior adults throughout the los angeles area. additionally, menorah housing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midtown Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is HomeAid Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUI KAUHALE INC ↗
- Who funds CECILIA PLACE HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds EAH-CONTRA COSTA INC ↗
- Who funds Rodeo Senior Apartments Inc ↗
- Who funds PALM COURT SENIOR HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN WEST APARTMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds DUBLIN TRANSIT EAH INC ↗
- Who funds Los Robles Apartments Inc ↗
- Who funds HomeAid Hawaii ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Kalani Mala Inc ↗
- Who funds THREE OAKS FAMILY HOMES INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization EAH Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.