How much did EAH Inc grant in FY2024?

EAH Inc reported 6 grants totaling $790,756 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

EAH Inc

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

EAH Inc

To provide low-income housing

$791k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$278k

Largest

01What you fund

0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.4MEducation$594kPhilanthropy$7kOther$589k

02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$50k–250k5 grants · $478k
$250k+1 grant · $278k

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$274M

Total assets

Largest grants

HUI KAUHALE INC$278,224
POINTE ON VERMONT A2Z ENT LLC$170,625
GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC$100,000
EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC$80,150
EAH - CONTRA COSTA INC$67,035
SONOMA COUNTY AFFORDABLE HSG$60,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 11%. 5% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.3M · 7 repeat orgs$349k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.3M

$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%

+8%

Still filing today

86%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $171k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HK
HUI KAUHALE INC
5× · 2018–2024 · $919k · revenue +2% · 63% of their budget
EC
EAH - CONTRA COSTA INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $602k · revenue +30%
GO
GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $554k · revenue +35% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

FW
FOUNTAIN WEST APARTMENTS INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $51k · revenue +54%
GO
GOLDEN OAK MANOR INC
one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -14%
DT
DUBLIN TRANSIT EAH INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $31k · revenue +1112651%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arbor Court Inc

The corporation was organized to provide persons with physical disabilities with housing facilities on a nonprofit basis pursuant to section 811 of the national affordable housing act of 1990.

Human Services

Rodeo Senior Apartments Inc

To provide low-income housing for the elderly

Housing & Shelter

Sparks Way Commons Inc

To create and maintain a limited equity housing cooperative for low- and moderate-income persons.

—

East Bay Housing Organizations

East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) is a member-driven organization working to create, preserve, and protect affordable housing opportunities for low-income communities by advocating, organizing, educating, and building coalitions.

Housing & Shelter

Mission Housing Dev Prop Iii Inc

To provide low-income housing

Housing & Shelter

Eah Inc

To provide low-income housing

Housing & Shelter

Buckelew Housing Inc

To provide mentally ill persons with housing facilities and services.

Housing & Shelter

Satellite Affordable Housing Associates

To benefit and support satellite affordable housing associates in carrying out its purposes by providing management and related services to its affiliates, all of which are california non-profit public benefit corporations organized to…

—

Colosimo Apartments Inc

To benefit and support mission housing development corporation, a california nonprofit public benefit corporation, and its purposes in accordance with section 509(a)(3) of the internal revenue code.

Housing & Shelter

San Rafael Rotary Manor

To provide elderly persons of modest means with housing facilities and services specially designed to meet their physical, social and psychological needs and to promote their health, security, happiness, and usefulness, the charges for…

Housing & Shelter

Echo Park Senior Citizen Housing

Echo park senior citizen housing corporation, a california nonprofit corporation was formed to own a 41-unit rental housing project for the very low income elderly located in los angeles, california. the operations of the project began in…

Housing & Shelter

Preserving Affordable Housing Longterm

Pahali's mission is to acquire and hold land for permanently affordable housing and other community-serving uses in East Palo Alto, CA.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eah-Contra Costa Inc and the most unlike its peers is HomeAid Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

8/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$2,437,675Education$593,887Other$589,091Philanthropy$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EAH Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 942832606 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EAH COMMUNITY HOUSING INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to EAH Inc?

Find your warmest path to EAH Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EAH Inc

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to EAH Inc?

More from the funding graph

EAH Inc

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to EAH Inc?

More from the funding graph