Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc

Support the oklahoma city community foundation, inc.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.

Human Services$490kHealth$331kEducation$296kCivil Rights$137kCommunity Improvement$134kEmployment$130kPhilanthropy$125kInternational$25kArts & Culture$16kOther$736k
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $726,913 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,061,913 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $335,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $634k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$40,000
NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$35,000
METAFUND$34,014
MUSKOGEE ORGANIZATION NARCOTIC & ALCOHOL REFERRAL COUSELING HELP (MONARCH)$30,000
SHERWIN MILLER MUSEUM OF JEWISH ART INC$30,000
GREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC$25,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL OKC - ERNA CROUCH PRESCHOOL$20,609
CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
A NEW LEAF INC$20,000
DALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER$20,000
NEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC$20,000
KELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY & NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC$20,000
MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HOME OF HOPE INC: $25k → 21%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $25k → 16%THE ARC OF OKLAHOMA: $15k → 15%Oklahoma Foundation for the Disabled: $10k → 16%Oklahoma Foundation for the Disabled: $10k → 16%Oklahoma Foundation for the Disabled: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 25 repeat orgs$730k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
22

Total granted

$1.6M
$380k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+3%

Still filing today

72%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEmploymentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $360k · revenue +16%
  • KB
    KELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY AND NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +7%
  • MC
    MUSKOGEE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CENTRAL INDUSTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • Hearts for Hearing Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +71%
  • TC
    The Children's Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Disability Law Center Inc

To protect, promote and expand the rights of people with disabilities.

Crime & Legal
2
Independent Opportunties Inc of Oklahoma

Provide the highest quality residential services to people with developmental disabilities. a major part of the mission is to provide opportunities to these individuals based upon their right to a normal daily routine. specifically, it is…

Unclassified
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
5
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
6
Horizons of Okaloosa County Inc

To create a path from disability to capability by providing exceptional services so people of all ages can work, plan, learn, achieve personal goals, and live meaningful lives.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma Assistive Technology Foundation

To assist persons with disabilities in obtaining assistive technology so they can become independent and productive members of the community.

Human Services
8
Oklahoma Parents Center Inc

The programs and services of OPC are based on the concept of educating parents to improve their child's quality of life. Our mission is to train, educate and support parents, families, professionals and consumers in building partnerships…

Health
9
Oklahoma Connections Academy Inc

Oklahoma connections inc, a public charter school, uses the connections curriculum to offer oklahoma students in grades k-12 an exceptional learning experience.

Education
10
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
11
Oklahoma Christian Academy Inc

Establish, maintain, and conduct a school for the instruction and training of youth.

Education
12
Autism Foundation of Oklahoma

To improve the quality of life for oklahomans with autism and their families.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Flo & Morris Mizel Jewish Community Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr21%6%10–20yr20%27%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr13%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr20%18%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr13%49%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/68
the rest of the field
12%
3,494/29,840

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/53
Grantees still filing
29/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA — $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMAA NEW LEAF INC — $75,000 · OtherA NEW LEAF INCCITY OF MUSKOGEE — $65,535 · OtherCITY OF MUSKOGEEMCM FOOD PANTRY — $55,000 · OtherMCM FOOD PANTRYTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL — $41,080 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $35,000 · OtherLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC — $60,000 · OtherLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $50,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA+26 more — $400,625 · Other+26 moreJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE — $360,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGI…OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FO…Hearts for Hearing Foundation — $25,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH — $25,000 · Human ServicesHOME OF HOPE INC — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesKELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY AND NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 · HealthKELLY B TODD CE…GREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES — $35,000 · HealthGREEN COUNTRY B…B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) — $30,000 · HealthB'NAI B'RITH HO…The Children's Center Inc — $25,000 · HealthThe Children's …CEREBRAL PALSY OF OKLAHOMA INC — $22,000 · HealthCEREBRAL PALSY …Down Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma — $20,000 · HealthDown Syndrome A…CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $20,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDI…AUTISMOKLAHOMAORG INC — $20,000 · HealthAUTISMOKLAHOMAO…COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC — $15,000 · HealthJBI INTERNATIONAL INC — $13,500 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthThe Northeastern State University Foundation Inc — $65,000 · EducationThe Northeast…Oklahoma State University Foundation — $45,000 · EducationOklahoma Stat…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…MUSKOGEE COMMUNITY BAND ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · EducationMUSKOGEE COMM…BEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC — $25,000 · EducationBEYOND THE SP…THE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INC — $20,000 · EducationTHE ACADEMY O…TRINITY SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · EducationZOE INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 · EducationPUTNAM CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationNorthern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc — $10,000 · EducationFLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $6,000 · EducationMUSKOGEE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $115,000 · Civil RightsOKLAHOMA RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE — $22,400 · Civil RightsNEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementMETAFUND CORPORATION — $34,014 · Community ImprovementNot Your Average Joe — $60,000 · EmploymentSOUTH CENTRAL INDUSTRIES INC — $50,000 · EmploymentNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC — $20,000 · Employment
Other$902,240Human Services$490,000Health$330,500Education$296,000Civil Rights$137,400Community Improvement$134,014Employment$130,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE — $360,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetKELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY AND NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetMUSKOGEE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $115,000 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetNEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC — $100,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Northeastern State University Foundation Inc — $65,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC — $60,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetNot Your Average Joe — $60,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL INDUSTRIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKOGEE ORGANIZATION FOR NARCOTIC AND ALCOHOL — $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMUSKOGEE COMMUNITY BAND ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH — $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND THE SPECTRUM OK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetOKLAHOMA RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE — $22,400 over 4y, 13% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF OKLAHOMA INC — $22,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetDown Syndrome Association of Central Oklahoma — $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN STUDIES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH THEATRE OF OKLAHOMA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTRINITY SCHOOL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC — $13,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetZOE INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBranch 15 Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPUTNAM CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMuskogee Little Theatre Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Communities Foundatio…Tulsa Community Found…The Anne and Henry Za…Arvest FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…Inasmuch FoundationEl and Thelma Gaylord…Sarkeys FoundationKirkpatrick Foundatio…Carl C Anderson Sr an…City of Muskogee Foun…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK61.4× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Arvest Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · City of Muskogee Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 320%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Dale Rogers Training Center Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc — 45% of income from government
  • Neighbors Building Neighborhoods Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Green Country Behavioral Health Services — 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
32get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc?

Find your warmest path to E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines