Skip to content

· Private foundation

E P Woodruff Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$114kArts & Culture$77kFood & Nutrition$70kYouth Development$61kHousing & Shelter$47kEducation$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kAnimals$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BCYFR SUPPORTERS$8,000
LYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY$7,500
HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY$5,000
SALVATION ARMY - BROWNWOOD$5,000
ALDERSGATE ENRICHMENT CENTER$5,000
PEARL GRIFFIN MEMORIAL LATCH KEY PR$5,000
ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$5,000
TEXAS RAMP PROJECT$5,000
BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION$5,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE$5,000
BANGS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
CORINNE T SMITH ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
BROWN COUNTY PRISON MINISTRY$3,500
BROOKESMITH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTME$3,000
CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS: $5k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $5k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $5k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $5k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $5k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $4k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $4k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER: $4k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%BROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%BROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $2k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $2k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of E P Woodruff Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

E P Woodruff Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$447k · 29 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
11

Total granted

$447k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+560%

Still filing today

48%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $53k · revenue +269%
  • HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +26%
  • TA
    The Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • LK
    LATCH KEY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CT
    CENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CT
    CORRINE T SMITH ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Keep Brown County Beautiful
Environment
2
Greenwood Volunteer Fire Department

Provide Volunteer Fire Fighting Service To Rural Portions of Midland County, TX: Extinguish Grass Fires, Residential Fires, Farm Building Fires, And Rural Industrial Fires, Etc.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Hays County Brown Santa

Hays County Brown Santa is dedicated to supporting families in need during the holiday season through acts of kindness, volunteerism, and community-ensuring families in Hays County feel remembered, cared for, and valued.

Human Services
4
The Robert Burns Society of West Texas
Public Safety & Disaster
5
Brown County Art Guild Inc
—
6
Brownsville Teen Center

To provide nutrition and home essentials to low income families

—
7
Brownwood Community Library Assoc

The associations mission is to provide a free public library for the residents of brownwood and brown county, texas

Education
8
The Library At Cedar Creek Lake

Provide library services to a three county area in rural east texas.

Education
9
South Brazos County Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department, providing fire, rescue, and medical services to a population of approximately 22,000 residents, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Brazos Volunteer Fire Department

To provide immediate response to fire and emergency needs in the brazos area of palo pinto county, tx and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Southern Brooks Volunteer Fire Departmen

Fire, medical and other emergency first responders servicing rural brooks county in south texas

—
12
Brownsville Historical Association
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bcyfr Supporters Brown County Fair Association; the most unlike its peers is Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEARL GRIFFIN MEMORIAL LATCH KEY PR: $37,000 · OtherPEARL GRIFFIN MEMORIAL LATCH KEY PRSALVATION ARMY - BROWNWOOD: $32,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY - BROWNWOODCORINNE T SMITH ANIMAL SHELTER: $20,500 · OtherCORINNE T SMITH ANIMAL SHELTERROCKY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH MLS ON W: $17,500 · OtherROCKY CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH MLS ON WGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $13,500 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIESMEALS ON WHEELS OF BROWNWOOD AND EA: $11,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10,500 · OtherBROWNWOOD COMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNC: $8,500 · OtherBCYFR SUPPORTERS BROWN COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · Other+21 more: $59,750 · Other+21 moreLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC: $52,500 · EducationLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS…HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $35,160 · EducationHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSI…BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION INC: $6,500 · EducationBROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIA…The Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc: $28,000 · Human ServicesThe Ark Domest…CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $18,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL TEXAS …BROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS: $15,000 · Human ServicesBROWN COUNTY T…SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAV…TEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PR…BROWN COUNTY HOME SOLUTIONS INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterBROWN COUNTY …HOPE HOME MINISTRY: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE HOME MIN…ALDERSGATE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $33,500 · ReligionARTS COUNCIL OF BROWNWOOD: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBANGS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $12,750 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$218,250Education$94,160Human Services$61,500Housing & Shelter$56,500Religion$33,500Arts & Culture$13,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC: $52,500 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $35,160 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALDERSGATE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $33,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetThe Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc: $28,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $18,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS: $15,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBROWN COUNTY HOME SOLUTIONS INC: $13,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetBANGS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $12,750 over 3y, 21% of budgetHOPE HOME MINISTRY: $11,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetBCYFR SUPPORTERS BROWN COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWNWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALDERSGATE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BROWN COUNTY HOME SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BANGS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOME MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds BCYFR SUPPORTERS BROWN COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF BROWNWOOD ↗
  • Who funds BROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS VETERANS MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds DAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BROWNWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Texas Foundation IncTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Texas Foundation Inc · Tom & Lilian Grinnan Wilkinson Trust · B C and Gladys L Drinkard Foundation Inc · Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inc · Thomas B Shoemake Trust · The 1687 Foundation · Kelly Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E P Woodruff Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E P Woodruff Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to E P Woodruff Trust?

    Find your warmest path to E P Woodruff Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E P Woodruff’s filings →

    More from the funding graph