Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$301k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$623kHuman Services$483kFood & Nutrition$234kEducation$220kCrime & Legal$120kArts & Culture$107kHealth$58kRecreation & Sports$49kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $108k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $193k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES$40,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB$35,000
PEARL GRIFFIN LATCH KEY PROG$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,750
ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER$20,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH BROWNWOOD$17,500
CASA IN THE HEART OF TX$15,000
BROWNWOOD ISD TUITION FUND$10,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-TEXAS TRAILS$10,000
ARTS COUNCIL OF BROWNWOOD fbo STARS$8,500
LYRIC PERFORMING ARTS$8,000
HOPE HOME MINISTRY$8,000
BROWN COUNTY MUSEUM OF HISTORY$7,800
Individual grant recipient$7,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 19%CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 19%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20k → 17%BROWN COUNTY TOYS FOR KIDS: $5k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 42 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
8

Total granted

$1.9M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

17%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentEmploymentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $140k · revenue +33%
  • LP
    LYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +269%
  • CW
    CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP
    5× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARK
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LR
    LEHNIS RAILROAD MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BROWNWOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
2
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
3
Brown County Christian Academy

Proividing a classical christian academy for school-age children for the youth of brown county and surrounding counties

Education
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
5
Arts Council of Brownwood

To promote the Arts in the community by providing arts education opportunities (served 300+) through 2 organizations, hosted a Cinco de Mayo community event (8,000+ attendance), supported a county-wide art exhibition with multiple…

Arts & Culture
6
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
7
The Brownson Home Inc
Housing & Shelter
8
West Chester Christian Child Care

To provide safe and caring child care services for the church and community families using a Christ centered curriculum.

9
Pregnancy Care Center of the Northern Big Country

At the Pregnancy Care Center of the Northern Big Country, we strive to provide compassionate and confidential care to women who are facing unplanned pregnancies.

Human Services
10
Huntington County Child Advocacy Center Inc Dba Mckenzie's Hope

Provide a safe and compassionate, child focused center to promptly and thoroughly investigate child abuse.

Human Services
11
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
12
Jasons Center of Hope Inc

Provide assistance to residents of Kaufman County, Texas particularly focused in the Crandall area. We provide food, clothing, household items, and faith based counseling and intercessory prayer.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Home Ministry and the most unlike its peers is Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS GIRLS CLUB — $253,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES — $234,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIESLATCH KEY PROGRAM — $125,000 · OtherLATCH KEY PROGRAMBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-TEXAS TRAILS — $93,300 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-TEXAS TRAILSCASA IN THE HEART OF TEXAS — $90,000 · OtherCASA IN THE HEART OF TEXASSALVATION ARMY — $87,550 · OtherSALVATION ARMYFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH BROWNWOOD — $80,900 · OtherPEARL GRIFFIN LATCH KEY PROG — $80,000 · OtherBROWNWOOD ISD TUITION FUND — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · Other+35 more — $468,550 · Other+35 moreThe Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc — $140,000 · Human ServicesThe Ark Do…CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $22,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL TE…CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN — $12,000 · Human ServicesCHEROKEE H…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentRAISING YOUTH SERVICES — $18,000 · Youth DevelopmentLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC — $57,000 · EducationBROWNWOOD ART ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 · EducationCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP — $25,500 · EmploymentHOPE HOME MINISTRY — $8,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,637,300Human Services$179,500Youth Development$66,000Education$59,500Employment$25,500Housing & Shelter$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc — $140,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC — $57,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $48,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP — $25,500 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetBrown County Museum of History Inc — $23,800 over 6y, 13% of budgetCENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $22,500 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetRAISING YOUTH SERVICES — $18,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetCHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN — $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE HOME MINISTRY — $8,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc
  • Who funds LYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP
  • Who funds Brown County Museum of History Inc
  • Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
  • Who funds RAISING YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds CHEROKEE HOME FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds HOPE HOME MINISTRY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

E P Woodruff TrustTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: E P Woodruff Trust · Central Texas Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Harriett Gully Beadel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph