Skip to content
E & H Parnes Foundation INC at a glance

· Private foundation

E & H Parnes Foundation INC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$901k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.6MPhilanthropy$546kEducation$385kHuman Services$73kFood & Nutrition$71kInternational$31k
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $301k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK$324,868
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN$137,568
KEREN OLAM HATORAH$60,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR$36,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI$26,000
BMG STUDENT AID FUND$25,000
TORAH UMESORAH$25,000
CHESED V EMES INC$25,000
ADIREI TORAH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$21,600
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HARAN$18,000
TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNT$15,000
KOLLEL CHAZON ISH$13,000
CONG AHAVAS CHESED TORAH$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONG TIFERES TORAH: $22k → 14%ADIREI TORAH: $25k → 11%CONG TIFERES TORAH: $22k → 14%BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $25k → 11%CONG TIFERES TORAH: $22k → 14%BAIS MEDRASH GOVAHA: $25k → 11%CONG TIFERES TORAH: $18k → 14%BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $25k → 11%CONG TIFERES TORAH: $18k → 14%CHESED V EMES INC: $25k → 11%CONG TIFERES TORAH: $18k → 14%CHESED V EMES INC: $25k → 11%BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $25k → 11%BAIS MEDRASH GOVAHA: $20k → 11%BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $15k → 11%BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $15k → 11%BMG STUDENT AID FUND: $15k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR: $36k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR: $36k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR: $30k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $26k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH V'CHESED: $20k → 20%TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNT: $15k → 14%KEREN OLAM HATORAH: $60k → 11%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $325k → 20%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $214k → 20%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $159k → 20%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $112k → 20%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $111k → 20%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $93k → 20%CONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $67k → 20%FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HARAN: $18k → 20%FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HARAN: $18k → 20%FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HARAN: $18k → 20%MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $460k → 20%MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $322k → 20%MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $299k → 20%MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $138k → 20%MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $90k → 20%TORAH UMESORAH: $25k → 20%TORAH UMESORAH: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 39 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
11

Total granted

$4.1M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

31%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $154k · revenue +51%
  • BS
    BMG STUDENT AID FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +70%
  • KC
    KOLLEL CHAZON ISH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • DN
    DARCHEI NOAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
2
Shaarei Teshouva Vechaim

To promote torah study

Philanthropy
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
6
Toras Chaim Inc

To give grants to religious & educational institutions.

Religion
7
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
8
Ohr Avrohom and Moshe Inc

We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.

Public Benefit
9
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
11
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
12
Talmud Torah Tzfat Inc

We make grants to support orthodox jewish education.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Yeshivat HaRanInc; the most unlike its peers is Dressed With Dignity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $1,308,714 · OtherMESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLINCONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARK: $1,080,388 · OtherCONG AGUDATH ISRAEL OF BORO PARKAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA RASHBI: $156,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $118,800 · Other+36 more: $839,420 · Other+36 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $154,000 · InternationalFriends Of Yeshivat HaRanInc: $106,000 · InternationalKneses Hatorah: $53,000 · International+1 more: $2,600 · InternationalBMG STUDENT AID FUND: $120,000 · EducationTORAH ORE SEMINARY: $70,000 · EducationDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $30,000 · EducationTIFFERET MOSHE INC: $17,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,800 · EducationCHESED V EMES A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $17,500 · ReligionRUACH CHAIM INC: $2,500 · Religion+1 more: $1,800 · ReligionBETH ABA TRUST: $38,000 · PhilanthropyDARCHEI NOAM INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOHR YOSEF INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $28,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,503,322International$315,600Education$249,300Religion$71,800Philanthropy$54,000Food & Nutrition$28,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $154,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBMG STUDENT AID FUND: $120,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetKOLLEL CHAZON ISH: $79,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTORAH ORE SEMINARY: $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKneses Hatorah: $53,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetCHESED V EMES A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBETH ABA TRUST: $38,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $28,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTIFFERET MOSHE INC: $17,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR YOSEF INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUACH CHAIM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds BMG STUDENT AID FUND ↗
  • Who funds Friends Of Yeshivat HaRanInc ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL CHAZON ISH ↗
  • Who funds TORAH ORE SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds Kneses Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds CHESED V EMES A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BETH ABA TRUST ↗
  • Who funds DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAS CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds TIFFERET MOSHE INC ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI NOAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RCT INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR YOSEF INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nitzavim TrustThe Ojc FundThe Jmg FoundationJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundYes Ben Dovid Foundat…National Society for …Jewish Community Foun…The Weiskopf Family F…Regina Goldwasser Fou…Jewish Federation of …Grant Recommendation …
Nitzavim TrustNJ39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nitzavim Trust · The Ojc Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Grant Recommendation Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E & H Parnes Foundation INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E & H Parnes Foundation INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E & H Parnes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home