Skip to content
Dwight S Haldan Family Charitable Foundation 58271-0 & -1 at a glance

· Private foundation

Dwight S Haldan Family Charitable Foundation 58271-0 & -1

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$637k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MYouth Development$997kHealth$904kHuman Services$124kEnvironment$79kPhilanthropy$75kArts & Culture$68kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $295k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE$250,000
SONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN'S CHARITY$119,550
THE C4 FOUNDATION$115,000
SUTTER PACIFIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION$60,000
FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION$25,000
CHALLENGE FOR CHARITY$25,000
TEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS$20,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CLERC FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%CHILD HELP: $21k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
OR
NV
CT
CA
VA
DE
AZ
TN
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 16 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$3.8M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $892k · revenue +23%
  • SB
    SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS
    3× · 2018–2020 · $168k · revenue +37%
  • FY
    FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • WR
    WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -55%
  • CI
    CHILDHELP INC
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue -6%
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH ARIZONA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
The Foundation of Firsthealth Inc

Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).

—
4
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
5
Qlarant Inc

Qlarant inc's, mission is to improve health in the communities we serve.

Health
6
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Healthwise Incorporated

The healthwise mission is to help people make better health decisions.

Health
9
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
10
Sutter Health

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
12
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Arizona Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sutter Bay Hospitals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE: $1,371,540 · OtherST JUDESUTTER PACIFIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $545,000 · OtherSUTTER PACIFIC MEDICAL FOUNDATIONTHE C4 FOUNDATION: $441,000 · OtherTHE C4 FOUNDATIONFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $105,000 · Other+13 more: $232,855 · Other+13 moreSONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC: $891,550 · Recreation & SportsSONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN'S…+1 more: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS: $168,000 · HealthSUTTER BA…MAYO CLINIC: $130,000 · HealthMAYO CLIN…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $48,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WI…+2 more: $12,500 · HealthLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE: $50,200 · Arts & CultureTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $40,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCHILDHELP INC: $21,400 · Human ServicesFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10,423 · Human ServicesWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $30,000 · EnvironmentCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $20,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact: $5,000 · International
Other$2,695,395Recreation & Sports$894,050Health$358,500Arts & Culture$50,200Education$41,000Human Services$31,823Environment$30,000International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC: $891,550 over 9y, 22% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS: $168,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $105,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetChallenge for Charity Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE: $50,200 over 2y, 16% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $48,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $21,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10,423 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE 4TH DIMENSION RECOVERY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGlobal Impact: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Junior Golf Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Challenge for Charity Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE 4TH DIMENSION RECOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dwight S Haldan Family Charitable Foundation 58271-0 & -1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dwight S Haldan Family Charitable Foundation 58271-0 & -1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Western Rivers Conservancy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dwight S Haldan Family Charitable Foundation 58271-0 & -1’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home