Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dussin Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$178kReligion$58kHealth$36kRecreation & Sports$19kFood & Nutrition$15kInternational$13kHuman Services$7kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$35,000
MOUNTAIN PARK CHURCH$15,000
LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDAT$5,000
OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE$3,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$2,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS$2,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS$2,000
DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
CHRIS DUDLY FOUNDATION$1,000
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC$1,000
PACER ATHLETIC CLUB$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND$1,000
WAVERLEY HITORIC FOUNDATION$1,000
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $2k → 11%CONVOY OF HOPE: $2k → 15%OREGON SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 8%LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDAT: $5k → 8%LOAVES AND FISHES: $2k → 12%CHRIS DUDLY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40k → 18%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6k → 21%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $1k → 9%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $2k → 11%CONVOY OF HOPE: $2k → 15%OREGON SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 8%LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDAT: $5k → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 12%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $38k → 18%INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC: $5k → 21%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $1k → 9%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $2k → 11%CONVOY OF HOPE: $2k → 15%OREGON SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 8%LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDAT: $5k → 8%LOAVES AND FISHES CENTERS INC: $1k → 12%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 18%INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC: $1k → 21%STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $1k → 11%CONVOY OF HOPE: $1k → 15%OR SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 8%LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDAT: $5k → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 12%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $34k → 18%INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC: $1k → 21%DAVID SIMANTON FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%PACER ATHLETIC CLUB: $2k → 8%LOAVES AND FISHES CENTERS INC: $1k → 12%OSU CASCADES HOSPITALITY PROGRAM: $5k → 18%PACER ATHLETIC CLUB: $2k → 8%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 12%PACER ATHLETIC CLUB: $1k → 8%LOAVES AND FISHES: $1k → 12%MOUNTAIN PARK CHURCH: $15k → 8%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 12%MOUNTAIN PARK CHURCH: $15k → 8%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 12%MOUNTAIN PARK CHURCH: $15k → 8%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 12%MOUNTAIN PARK CHURCH: $12k → 8%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $2k → 12%LAKE OSWEGO FOOTBALL BOOSTER CLUB: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 18 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$258k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+83%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +112%
  • PA
    Pacer Athletic Club
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +83%
  • OC
    OSU CASCADES HOSPITALITY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • DS
    DAVID SIMANTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
2
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
3
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
4
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
5
In the Gap Inc

Equip and inspire young adults to be positive leaders who model integrity, passionately love jesus christ, and effectively influence children to do the same.

Religion
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
12
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Pacer Athletic Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNTAIN PARK CHURCH: $57,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN PARK CHURCHOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYLAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherLAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INCOHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $9,000 · OtherOHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE+19 more: $46,500 · Other+19 moreOregon State University Foundation: $111,500 · EducationOregon State University FoundationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONPacer Athletic Club: $6,000 · EducationSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · HealthPregnancy Resource Center INC dba Hope Pregnancy Center: $4,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC: $7,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 · ReligionCONVOY OF HOPE: $7,000 · InternationalBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$167,500Education$124,500Health$15,000Religion$13,000International$7,000Human Services$3,000Crime & Legal$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon State University Foundation: $111,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacer Athletic Club: $6,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center INC dba Hope Pregnancy Center: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIS DUDLEY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWAVERLEY HISTORIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Pacer Athletic Club ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center INC dba Hope Pregnancy Center ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRIS DUDLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAVERLEY HISTORIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dussin Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dussin Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dussin Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Dussin Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dussin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph