· Public charity
Dupaco Community Credit Union
Help members build a life worth loving
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $405,570 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $584,558 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $178,988 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $258k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation | $133,000 |
| Creative Adventure Lab | $124,500 |
| Holy Family Catholic Schools | $45,540 |
| Greater Dubuque Development Corporation | $25,000 |
| Dyersville Industries Inc | $12,500 |
| Multicultural Family Center | $10,000 |
| Four Mounds Foundation HEART Program | $10,000 |
| Mississippi Driftless Regional Foundation | $10,000 |
| The Fountain of Youth Program | $10,000 |
| National Mississippi River Museum and Aquarium | $10,000 |
| Iowa Credit Union League | $8,470 |
| Key City Creative Center | $6,560 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DRDupaco RW Hoefer Foundation6× · 2018–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +15% · 91% of their budget
- CACreative Adventure Lab Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $451k · revenue +44%
- DCDubuque County Historical Society5× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- WBWaterloo Black Hawksone grant, 2020 · $9k
- DSDUBUQUE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +186%
- NRNewco Riders LLCone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Dubuque Area Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) will lead tourism destination promotion and development to enhance and expand the Dubuque Area experience.
Support student achievement by promoting investment in the Dubuque Public Schools.
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.
The visiting nurse association exists to promote and improve the health, wellness, and safety of individuals and communities through provision of comprehensive, home, and community based initiatives and services.
To promote and advance activities beneficial to iowa lutheran hospital.
To attract businesses to locate in madison county, iowa
Christian caring - enhancing lives through a commitment to individualized care in a home empowered by god's love.
The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.
The foundation was structured to encourage funding of the jewish federation of greater des moines, and is responsible for adding financial stability by broadening the funding base and thereby improving the ability of the des moines jewish…
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque and the most unlike its peers is Open Doors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation ↗
- Who funds Creative Adventure Lab Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER DUBUQUE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Dubuque County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ST MARY'S ↗
- Who funds DUBUQUE MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds DUBUQUE MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IOWA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Stonehill Franciscan Services ↗
- Who funds IOWA CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DYERSVILLE INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds KEY CITY CREATIVE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF DUBUQUE ↗
- Who funds INSPIRING COMMUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds The Fountain of Youth Program ↗
- Who funds Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa ↗
- Who funds CEDAR RAPIDS FREEDOM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOUR MOUNDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI DRIFTLESS REGIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUBUQUE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds FINLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GROW CEDAR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds St Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LUTHER MANOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JO DAVIESS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOORS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Heartland Charitable Trust · James B & Melita a McDonough Foundation · Dubuque Racing Association Ltd · The Klauer Foundation Trust Xxxxx5009 · Spahn & Rose Lumber Co Charitable Fdtn · Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Ay McDonald Charitable Foundation · Falb Family Charitable Foundation · Mathis Pfohl Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · The Butler Family Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dupaco Community Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.