Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dunn Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
176
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$6.1MCivil Rights$2.0MEnvironment$1.5MEducation$1.3MArts & Culture$1.2MPhilanthropy$1.0MHuman Services$696kCommunity Improvement$674kOther$0
02FY2024 · 176 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $289k
  • $10k–50k70 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THOUSAND CURRENTS$90,000
GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND INC$75,000
THE DAILY SOURCE LTD$70,000
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$70,000
OUTRIGHT ACTION INTERNATIONAL$65,000
FREEDOM UNITED$60,000
GROUNDSWELL INTERNATIONAL INC$60,000
MEDGLOBAL INC$60,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$60,000
THE SOCIAL CHANGE NEST - RAWA$57,000
GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC$55,000
BACKWARD SOCIETY EDUCATION (BASE)$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SERVICE COMMITTEE - UUSC$50,000
STICHTING INSTITUTE ON STATELESSNESS AND INCLUSION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($15M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($2.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AL OTRO LADO: $15k → 14%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $40k → 13%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $60k → 16%GOOD NEIGHBOR SETTLEMENT HOUSE: $5k → 23%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $40k → 18%FREEDOM UNITED: $60k → 8%MERCY CENTER INC: $10k → 6%AL OTRO LADO: $10k → 14%Hour Children Inc: $25k → 13%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $10k → 18%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 13%FREEDOM UNITED: $10k → 8%Mercy Center Inc: $10k → 6%NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEERS: $55k → 19%AL OTRO LADO: $8k → 14%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $20k → 13%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $45k → 16%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $5k → 18%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 13%MERCY CENTER INC: $6k → 6%NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEERS: $50k → 19%AL OTRO LADO: $5k → 14%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $20k → 13%Mariposa DR Foundation: $45k → 16%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $5k → 18%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 13%NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEERS: $50k → 19%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $20k → 13%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEERS: $50k → 19%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $15k → 11%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $10k → 13%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEERS: $50k → 19%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEERS: $50k → 19%MARIPOSA DR FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%Mariposa DR Foundation: $10k → 16%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $40k → 17%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $30k → 17%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $30k → 17%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $30k → 17%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT (IRAP): $18k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT (IRAP): $13k → 17%NEW ENGLAND INTERNATIONAL DONORS INC: $10k → 16%NEW ENGLAND INTERNATIONAL DONORS INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($2.3M)

23 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$1.5M · 22 grants
Nepal$230k · 5 grants
South Africa$70k · 3 grants
Haiti$65k · 5 grants
Ireland$55k · 2 grants
Uganda$50k · 1 grant
Netherlands$50k · 1 grant
Belgium$45k · 2 grants
El Salvador$43k · 4 grants
Israel$30k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Dunn Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Dunn Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 204 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

204 repeat relationships: 130 still active in FY2024, 74 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

204
151

Total granted

$14M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+33%

Still filing today

64%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $539k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OI
    OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2018–2024 · $695k · revenue +608%
  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    7× · 2018–2024 · $570k · revenue +47%
  • GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $450k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • LF
    LAHEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $500k
  • DS
    DF SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • SE
    SOLAR ELECTRIC LIGHT FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $106k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
4
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
10
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
11
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
12
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free the Slaves; the most unlike its peers is New England Circle D/B/a Global Citizens Circle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

211 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 211 of the 405 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
208/211
Grantees still filing
148/211
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STICHTING INSTITUTE ON STATELESSNESS AND INCLUSION: $1,145,000 · OtherSTICHTING INSTITUTE ON STATELESSNESS AND INCLUSIONTHE DAILY SOURCE LTD: $813,000 · OtherTHE DAILY SOURCE LTDOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $695,000 · OtherOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONALLAHEY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherLAHEY FOUNDATIONLahey Hospital & Medical Center: $435,000 · OtherBrownsville Think Tank Matters Inc: $300,000 · Other+108 more: $4,583,108 · Other+108 morePOR CRISTO INC: $420,000 · InternationalPOR CRISTO INCTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $345,000 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTSGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $246,500 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL…Global Impact: $235,000 · InternationalGlobal ImpactGroundswell International Inc: $210,000 · InternationalGroundswell Internationa…International Rescue Committee INC: $195,600 · InternationalInternational Rescue Com…FREE THE SLAVES: $175,200 · InternationalHUMANITY RISES INC: $164,900 · InternationalUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc: $150,000 · InternationalURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $135,000 · InternationalHOPE BORDER INSTITUTE: $130,150 · International+24 more: $1,204,800 · International+24 moreMariposa DR Foundation: $340,000 · Human ServicesNOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEER CORPORATION: $305,500 · Human ServicesHOUR CHILDREN INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesCHOOSE LOVE INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesFreedom United: $70,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC: $60,213 · Human ServicesMERCY CENTER CORPORATION: $50,500 · Human ServicesAL OTRO LADO: $47,500 · Human Services+9 more: $182,596 · Human ServicesPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $570,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $137,500 · EducationSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $115,000 · EducationFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC: $110,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK: $50,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $40,000 · EducationFARMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Education+6 more: $103,000 · EducationGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $390,000 · EnvironmentNEWFOUND LAKE REGION ASSOCIATION: $168,500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $107,500 · EnvironmentSOLAR ELECTRIC LIGHT FUND: $106,200 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INNOVATION FUND: $60,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $49,500 · Environment+5 more: $69,000 · EnvironmentGIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $450,000 · HealthMedGlobal Inc: $275,000 · Health+2 more: $30,000 · HealthTHE FREEDOM FUND: $275,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation Inc: $133,500 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyREFUGEE HEALTH ALLIANCE: $50,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,471,108International$3,612,150Human Services$1,336,309Education$1,165,500Environment$950,700Health$755,000Philanthropy$568,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL: $695,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $570,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $450,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetPOR CRISTO INC: $420,000 over 6y, 46% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $390,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $345,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMariposa DR Foundation: $340,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetNOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEER CORPORATION: $305,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBrownsville Think Tank Matters Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 57% of budgetTHE FREEDOM FUND: $275,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMedGlobal Inc: $275,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $246,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGlobal Impact: $235,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $210,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $195,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFREE THE SLAVES: $175,200 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetNEWFOUND LAKE REGION ASSOCIATION: $168,500 over 8y, 18% of budgetHUMANITY RISES INC: $164,900 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL: $157,325 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc: $150,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC: $140,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHOOSE LOVE INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $137,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $135,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $133,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE BORDER INSTITUTE: $130,150 over 6y, 11% of budgetEDESIA INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $115,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetFriends in Solidarity Inc: $110,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetFWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC: $110,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCASA PROJECT INC: $110,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $107,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $106,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetVILLAGE HELP FOR SOUTH SUDAN INC: $94,000 over 7y, 51% of budgetAcceso Impact Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYHEW: $83,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetEARTHSPARK INTERNATIONAL CORP: $78,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetREFUGEE PROTECTION INTERNATIONAL INC: $77,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFreedom United: $70,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetREFUGEPOINT INC: $61,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC: $60,213 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INNOVATION FUND: $60,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds POR CRISTO INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
  • Who funds Mariposa DR Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME MISSION VOLUNTEER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Brownsville Think Tank Matters Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FREEDOM FUND ↗
  • Who funds MedGlobal Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell International Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE THE SLAVES ↗
  • Who funds NEWFOUND LAKE REGION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITY RISES INC ↗
  • Who funds MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOOSE LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds URGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE BORDER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EDESIA INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Friends in Solidarity Inc ↗
  • Who funds FWDUS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA40.7× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Impactassetsinc · Fwdus Education Fund Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Choose Love Inc · The Shapiro Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dunn Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dunn Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Notre Dame Mission Volunteer Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • College for Social Innovation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Mercy Center Corporation: 21% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Doc Wayne Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Open Table Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Regis College: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Lexington Historical Society: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Endicott College: 1% of income from government
  • Hope Community Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue League of Boston: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 405 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dunn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph