· Private foundation
Dunlap Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO | $50,000 |
| MARTHAS VILLAGE & KITCHEN | $50,000 |
| GALILEE CENTER | $11,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BIGHORN BAM | $10,000 |
| CENTURY VILLAGES CABRILLO-BANNING | $10,000 |
| ANIMAL SAMARITANS SPCA | $6,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF DESSERT | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TRAVELING PAWS | $5,000 |
| LOVING ALL ANIMALS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $432k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $349k · revenue +226%
University of Arizona Foundation7× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +109%- GCGALILEE CENTER INC7× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +730%
Funded once
- EMEisenhower Medical Centergraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +94%
- CVCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
- BABRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Help rescue, adopt, and provide medical care for abandoned animals in the coachella valley
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…
See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…
To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…
The organization is a cat rescue. The organization provides the San Bernardino community stray cats with care such as vetrinarian intervention and adoption.
Humane treatment of animals
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Galilee Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds GALILEE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
- Who funds College of the Desert Foundation ↗
- Who funds LOVING ALL ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds PET RESCUE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DES ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRAVELING PAWS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Desert Community Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Impact Through Golf Foundation · Charity Works · The Auen Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Louis and Mary Silver Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dunlap Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.