Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dulude Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$136kEducation$133kEnvironment$118kArts & Culture$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$54kPhilanthropy$49kAnimals$44kHuman Services$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST$10,000
NEW LONDON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
COLBY-SAWYER COLLEGE$10,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$10,000
ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
SULLIVAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
THE BOSTON FOUNDATION$5,000
THE FELLS HISTORIC ESTATE & GARDENS$5,000
LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION$5,000
LIFE SUPPORT$5,000
UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$5,000
COA CHAPIN SENIOR CENTER$5,000
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY$2,500
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $515 → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $3k → 10%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $3k → 10%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $3k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $2k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $2k → 7%HOPELINK: $500 → 9%HOPELINK: $500 → 9%HOPELINK: $500 → 9%HOPELINK: $500 → 9%HOPELINK: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Dulude Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Dulude Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$680k · 63 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

63 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
15

Total granted

$680k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+30%

Still filing today

70%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    Life Support
    5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +50%
  • LS
    LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +66%
  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    6× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • PG
    PINECREST GARDENS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
4
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
5
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
6
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the most unlike its peers is Live Like Raija. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersMilitary Veterans SupportFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development ServicesLocal History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/64
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
43/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Life Support — $42,700 · OtherLife SupportPERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE — $36,000 · OtherPERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTEJEFF DULUDE MELANOMA FOUNDATION — $29,500 · OtherJEFF DULUDE MELANOMA FOUNDATIONTHE FELLS HISTORIC ESTATE & GARDENS — $24,000 · OtherTHE FELLS HISTORIC ESTATE & GARDENSCOA CHAPIN SENIOR CENTER — $21,500 · OtherCOA CHAPIN SENIOR CENTERFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $20,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERSUNAPEE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $19,000 · OtherSUNAPEE HISTORICAL SOCIETYSALVATION ARMY — $11,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA INC ST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,500 · OtherBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM — $17,000 · OtherBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM+34 more — $71,710 · Other+34 moreLAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION — $42,500 · EnvironmentLAKE SUNAPEE PRO…AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST — $35,000 · EnvironmentAUSBON SARGENT L…SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS — $17,500 · EnvironmentSOCIETY FOR THE …NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 · EnvironmentNEW HAMPSHIRE LA…PROTECT OUR WINTERS — $7,499 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WINT…SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNI…CLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $21,500 · EducationCLARKSON UNI…Colby-Sawyer College — $12,500 · EducationColby-Sawyer…ABBOTT LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $12,500 · EducationABBOTT LIBRA…Lake Forest College — $3,000 · EducationEASTSIDE PATHWAYS — $3,000 · Education+4 more — $7,500 · Education+4 moreLake Sunapee Region Visiting Nurse Association — $20,000 · HealthLake Sunapee…The New London Hospital Association Inc — $15,000 · HealthThe New Lond…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $10,645 · HealthDana-Farber …NORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION — $8,575 · HealthNORTHWEST HO…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $8,500 · HealthAMERICAN CAN…NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthNATIONAL PSO…Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $5,000 · HealthDartmouth-Hi…Youth Eastside Services — $4,500 · HealthYouth Eastsi…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthBoston Foundation Inc — $36,500 · PhilanthropyBoston Fo…Rotary Club of Upper Kittitas County Foundation — $12,500 · PhilanthropyRotary Cl…SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $12,256 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VE…+1 more — $100 · PhilanthropyNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $36,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,125 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY — $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINK — $2,500 · Human Services+1 more — $515 · Human ServicesUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $30,000 · AnimalsSullivan County Humane Society — $6,500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $4,500 · AnimalsAMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Animals
Other$314,410Environment$109,999Education$85,000Health$81,720Philanthropy$61,356Human Services$49,640Animals$43,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLife Support — $42,700 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetLAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION — $42,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST — $35,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $21,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLake Sunapee Region Visiting Nurse Association — $20,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS — $17,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM — $17,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe New London Hospital Association Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRotary Club of Upper Kittitas County Foundation — $12,500 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetColby-Sawyer College — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABBOTT LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $12,256 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $10,645 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIRKLAND CENTER OF THE PERFORMING ARTS DBA KIRKLAND PERFORMANCE CENTER — $10,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION — $8,575 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SCHOOL OF PARIS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS — $7,499 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc — $6,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSullivan County Humane Society — $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,015 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Eastside Services — $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest College — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE PATHWAYS — $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVermont Public Radio — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTechbridge Girls — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPELINK — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIRKLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLASELL UNIVERSITY — $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC — $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Life Support ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Lake Sunapee Region Visiting Nurse Association ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds The New London Hospital Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Upper Kittitas County Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗
  • Who funds ABBOTT LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIRKLAND CENTER OF THE PERFORMING ARTS DBA KIRKLAND PERFORMANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HOPE & HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SCHOOL OF PARIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Mountain Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sullivan County Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationNew Hampshire Charita…Natalie W & Leo E Wol…Gates FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Ibm International Fou…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Claremont Savings Ban…The Burkehaven Family…Credit Unions in the …United Way of King Co…Puget Sound Energy Fo…
Seattle FoundationWA22.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Natalie W & Leo E Wolf Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · The Burkehaven Family Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dulude Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Lasell University — 4% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines