Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dugan-Scallon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$847k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$363k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$1.3MReligion$561kHuman Services$268kHealth$138kHousing & Shelter$134kRecreation & Sports$87kPublic Safety & Disaster$74kArts & Culture$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $233k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $363k
$26,176
Median grant
7
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACELLI CATHOLIC SCHOOL$362,500
QUEEN OF ANGELS PARISH$100,000
ST AUGUSTINE CHURCH$100,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SANTA ANA$50,000
LAURA BAKER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$35,000
GILLETTE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$30,000
CALVARY CEMETERY$27,000
HORMEL HISTORIC HOME$26,176
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MN$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
AUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC$12,500
MOWER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$12,000
KSMQ PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA$10,000
AUSTIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SANTA ANA: $50k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SANTA ANA: $50k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SANTA ANA: $50k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SANTA ANA: $2k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 15 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$2.4M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+4%

Still filing today

47%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    Assistance League of Santa Ana
    5× · 2021–2025 · $202k · revenue +98%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +23%
  • MC
    MOWER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $65k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OF HOLY ANGELS
    one grant, 2022 · $34k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
4
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
5
Fairview Health Services

Mission: Fairview is driven to heal, discover and educate for longer, healthier lives. Vision: Fairview is driving a healthier future. Values: Dignity: We value the uniqueness of each person and work to ensure everyone's right to privacy.…

Health
6
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
7
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
8
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
9
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
10
Swedish Covenant Health

Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

—
11
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
12
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laura Baker School Association; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUSTIN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC: $662,500 · OtherAUSTIN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INCPACELLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $618,000 · OtherPACELLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLSST AUGUSTINE CHURCH: $260,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE CHURCHLAURA BAKER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $134,000 · OtherLAURA BAKER SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONQUEEN OF ANGELS PARISH: $100,000 · OtherCALVARY CEMETERY: $94,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MN: $77,000 · Other+14 more: $275,872 · Other+14 moreAssistance League of Santa Ana: $202,000 · Human ServicesAssistance …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $86,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $51,000 · HealthMOWER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $55,000 · AnimalsKSMQ PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,221,372Human Services$272,000Health$137,000Animals$55,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAssistance League of Santa Ana: $202,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetLAURA BAKER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $134,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $86,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOWER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $55,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $51,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY: $32,500 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetHORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC: $26,176 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetKSMQ PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Assistance League of Santa Ana ↗
  • Who funds LAURA BAKER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MOWER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HORMEL HISTORIC HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds KSMQ PUBLIC SERVICE MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hormel Foods Corporation Charitable TrustMN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hormel Foods Corporation Charitable Trust · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dugan-Scallon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dugan-Scallon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dugan-Scallon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dugan-Scallon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dugan-Scallon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph