Skip to content
Dubon Family Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Dubon Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$75kReligion$58kEducation$35kPublic Benefit$20kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kInternational$8kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,090
Median grant
2
States reached
$467k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,090
UNBOUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 61% of grant dollars ($156k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($100k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%UNBOUND: $500 → 16%UNBOUND: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
IN
OH
CA
VA
NM
KS
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 39% of all-years giving ($100k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Honduras$100k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 6 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
26

Total granted

$78k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+14%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2022 · $34k · revenue +18%
  • ST
    ST THOMAS FELLOWSHIP HALL- ST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $33k
  • MO
    MOM'S OF NEW BRAUNFELS UNCENSORED FUND
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k

Funded once

  • TM
    TELA MARINE RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • DU
    DONA UN LIBRO CAMBIA UNA MENTE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • CO
    CITY OF EARLY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldatwork

To sponsor and conduct educational conferences, seminars, workshops and symposia for purposes of informing members and other interested parties on current research, legislation and practices in all phases of employee reward programs…

Membership Benefit
2
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
5
The Halo Trust (Usa) Inc

To protect lives and restore livelihoods of people affected by conflict: 1) to protect lives from the explosive threats and hazards resulting from conflict, 2) to reduce human suffering from armed violence and 3) to build resilient and…

International
6
Tearfund Usa Inc

Tearfund usa (the organization) is a christian international relief and development charity working globally to end poverty and injustice, and to restore dignity and hope in the world's poorest communities.

Human Services
7
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
8
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
9
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
10
National Veterans Foundation Inc

To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.

—
11
Make-a-Wish Foundation International

None

Human Services
12
Lutheran Services Florida Inc

Lutheran services florida brings god's healing, hope, and help to people in need in the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central & South Texas; the most unlike its peers is Blackberry Winter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TELA MARINE RESEARCH CENTER: $75,000 · OtherTELA MARINE RESEARCH CENTERTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $33,900 · OtherTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITYST THOMAS FELLOWSHIP HALL- ST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $33,334 · OtherST THOMAS FELLOWSHIP HALL- ST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCHDONA UN LIBRO CAMBIA UNA MENTE: $25,000 · OtherDONA UN LIBRO CAMBIA UNA MENTECITY OF EARLY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherLeo F Welch Jr Post 495 American Legion Dept of Indiana Inc: $10,000 · OtherBROWN COUNTY TEXAS COUNTY COMMISSIONER: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $31,360 · Other+17 moreWORLD CHRISTIAN CHARITY FUND: $5,000 · ReligionLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC: $3,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionBLACKBERRY WINTER INC: $2,000 · Community ImprovementUnbound: $1,600 · Human ServicesThe Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc: $400 · Human ServicesVALOR SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,063 · Animals
Other$238,594Religion$5,000Education$4,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Community Improvement$2,000Human Services$2,000Animals$1,063

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $33,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLeo F Welch Jr Post 495 American Legion Dept of Indiana Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWORLD CHRISTIAN CHARITY FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYRIC PERFORMING ARTS COMPANY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLACKBERRY WINTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUnbound: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $1,093 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALOR SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,063 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION-TEXAS CHAPTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ark Domestic Violence Shelter Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dubon Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dubon Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 8% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dubon Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home