Skip to content

· Private foundation

Duane and Marci Shaw Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.9MEducation$1.6MArts & Culture$62kInternational$5kHealth$2kHousing & Shelter$516Food & Nutrition$500Human Services$500
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JON M HUNTSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$20,000
HALE CENTRE THEATRE$5,950
THE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION$5,000
TUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$5,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES AT BYU$5,000
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS$2,500
WEST VALLEY ARTS FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UTAH FOSTER CARE: $500 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $516 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 8 repeat orgs$584k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +124% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$5.0M
$583k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+5%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MORE GOOD FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $125k · revenue +124%
  • BO
    BOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL
    5× · 2017–2022 · $75k · revenue +460%
  • HC
    HALE CENTRE THEATRE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF
    one grant, 2021 · $575k
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Utah Geological Foundation
—
3
Utah Valley Arts

Support various performing arts in utah.

—
4
Utah Arts Festival Foundation Inc

To produce the annual utah arts festival, for the purpose of promoting the arts and enhancing the quality of life in utah

Arts & Culture
5
Juab Fine Arts Council
Arts & Culture
6
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
7
Utah State Fair Corporation

The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.

Recreation & Sports
8
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
9
Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation

To promote, present and support artists, arts organizations and arts activities in order to further the development of the arts community and to benefit the public by expanding awareness, access and participation.

—
10
Cedar City Music Arts Association

Music & arts performances

Arts & Culture
11
Utah Film Center

Utah film center inspires and engages diverse audiences to initiate conversation and community building through curated film exhibition, educational programs, and artist support.

Arts & Culture
12
Utah Chamber Artists

The Utah Chamber Artists (UCA) is a world renowned, not-for-profit organization founded in 1991 to provide audiences with an artistic force that provides a wide variety of music of the highest caliber, presented in the finest manner. UCA…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is The Road Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $3,106,500 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSJON M HUNTSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $1,600,000 · OtherJON M HUNTSMAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESSTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF: $575,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF+5 more: $37,000 · OtherMORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationBOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL: $75,000 · ReligionTHE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · ReligionHALE CENTRE THEATRE: $39,194 · Arts & CultureTUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $22,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ROAD HOME: $516 · Human ServicesUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $500 · Human ServicesWest Valley Arts Foundation: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$5,318,500Education$125,000Religion$90,000Arts & Culture$61,694Human Services$1,016Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORE GOOD FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetBOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL: $75,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHALE CENTRE THEATRE: $39,194 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $22,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $516 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORE GOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL ↗
  • Who funds HALE CENTRE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds TUACAHN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds West Valley Arts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ashton Family FoundationUT17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ashton Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Woolley Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Duane and Marci Shaw Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Duane and Marci Shaw Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Duane and Marci Shaw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph