How much does Dt Midstream Foundation give?

Dt Midstream Foundation reported 35 grants totaling $141,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

What does Dt Midstream Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (20%), Recreation & Sports (16%), Arts & Culture (10%).

Who are Dt Midstream Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Claire Williams Oneil Foundation Co Michael Flanagan ($20k), Susquehanna County Interfaith ($20k), Pittsburgh Opera Inc ($15k).

Does Dt Midstream Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Dt Midstream Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Charities Aid Foundation America, National Philanthropic Trust, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc.

Where is Dt Midstream Foundation based?

Dt Midstream Foundation is based in MI.

Dt Midstream Foundation

Dt Midstream Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Dt Midstream Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$10k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$50kRecreation & Sports$40kArts & Culture$25kPhilanthropy$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kYouth Development$20kHealth$14kEducation$14kOther$0

02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k28 grants · $71k
$10k–50k7 grants · $70k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$2.7M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
DESOTO REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION	$10,000
SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY INTERFAITH	$10,000
CLAIRE WILLIAMS ONEIL FOUNDATION	$10,000
CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH INC	$10,000
LOUISIANA BAPTIST FOUNDATION	$10,000
PITTSBURGH OPERA	$10,000
SABINE FESTIVAL AND RODEO INC	$10,000
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY PHILANTHROPIC FUND	$5,000
VERNON PARISH POLICE JURY	$5,000
LEWIS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION	$5,000
DO GOOD LA INC	$5,000
FARMER FAMILY FOUNDATION CO	$3,200
NEIGHBOR 2 NEIGHBOR OF SOUTHWESTERN PENN	$2,500
RED RIVER COWBOY CHURCH	$2,500
PLEASANT MOUNT PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC	$2,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Dt Midstream Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Dt Midstream Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 5.0% directed abroad (not shown)

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$66k · 5 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$66k

$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%

+15%

Still filing today

60%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CW
CLAIRE WILLIAMS ONEIL FOUNDATION CO MICHAEL FLANAGAN
2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +151% · 35% of their budget
SC
SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY INTERFAITH
2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +16%
PO
PITTSBURGH OPERA INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +2%

Funded once

TW
The Way Community Center of Greene County
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +15%
TB
TEXAS BAPTIST MEN INC
one grant, 2023 · $10k
SF
SABINE FAIR AND RODEO
one grant, 2023 · $10k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Western Pennsylvania Foundation for the Arts

Arts & Culture

Carversville Farm Foundation

Food & Nutrition

Tuscarawas County Community Foundat

Philanthropy

Cranberry Township Volunteer Fire Company

Provide fire extinguishment services for the township and promote fire prevention and fire safety to the community through public awareness.

—

Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—

Pocono Mountain Regional Emergency Medical Services

Provide emergency ambulance services

Health

Hereford Volunteer Fire Company Inc

Volunteer fire fighting

Health

Wayne County Humane Society

Animals

Adams County Sheriffs Foundation

—

Garfield County Fire Foundation

Public Safety & Disaster

Greater Philadelphia Cancer Foundation - Honor of Barbara Colameco

Health

Cranberry Township Emergency Medical Service

To preserve life and promote health and safety in our community.

Health

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Freedom Inc; the most unlike its peers is Claire Williams Oneil Foundation Co Michael Flanagan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

12/21

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$137,128Human Services$37,500Philanthropy$20,000Arts & Culture$19,660Health$16,000Public Benefit$10,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA6.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dt Midstream Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dt Midstream Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dt Midstream Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dt Midstream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Dt Midstream’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home