Skip to content

· Public charity

Dreamchasers

Provide grants and scholarships for education, extracurricular activites, sports, health, medical, arts, sciences, religion and other nonprofit activities.

$947k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0158% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$748kArts & Culture$304kRecreation & Sports$65kYouth Development$31kReligion$25kHuman Services$12kHealth$8kMembership Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $776,665, the rows itemized in this filing. The $947,018 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $170,353 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $174k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $348k
$9,150
Median grant
5
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,615
EF EDUCATIONAL TOURS$64,900
UNIVERSITY OF TN KNOXVILLE$63,350
Individual grant recipient$63,350
CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY$56,150
Individual grant recipient$40,950
Individual grant recipient$40,800
DANCE WORKS$27,050
Individual grant recipient$21,610
ROCKSTAR ACADEMY OF DANCE$17,750
Individual grant recipient$17,150
Individual grant recipient$17,100
Individual grant recipient$15,500
Individual grant recipient$15,150
TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$14,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EF EDUCATIONAL TOURS: $65k → 8%PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $21k → 16%CHEERVILLE - HENDERSONVILLE: $42k → 8%ROCKVALVE HIGH SCHOOL CHEER: $13k → 9%DANCE FORCE: $101k → 11%DAVIDSON ACADEMY: $12k → 14%TENNESSEE TECH UNIVERSITY: $14k → 19%JACKSON STATE BASEBALL: $14k → 23%EF EDUCATIONAL TOURS: $45k → 8%PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $17k → 16%DC DANCE FACTORY: $34k → 4%ROCKSTAR ACADEMY OF DANCE: $18k → 7%CHEERVILLE - HENDERSONVILLE: $16k → 8%SOUTH HAVEN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $11k → 9%DANCE FORCE: $80k → 11%TENNESSEE TECH UNIVERSITY: $13k → 19%DC DANCE FACTORY: $17k → 4%ROCKSTAR ACADEMY OF DANCE: $13k → 7%TOES OF GRACE: $14k → 8%SPOTLITE DANCE STUDIO: $68k → 9%CLARKSVILLE ELITE GYMNASTICS: $65k → 11%DANCE WORKS: $39k → 9%CLARKSVILLE ELITE GYMNASTICS: $41k → 11%SPOTLITE DANCE STUDIO: $63k → 9%DANCE FORCE: $22k → 11%LEGACY CHEER: $19k → 14%DANCE WORKS: $30k → 9%DANCE FORCE: $16k → 11%LEGACY CHEER: $15k → 14%SPOTLITE DANCE STUDIO: $26k → 9%PAGES CLARKSVILLE SPORTING: $12k → 11%DANCE WORKS: $27k → 9%ACRO DANCE EXPRESS: $11k → 11%SPOTLITE DANCE STUDIO: $11k → 9%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%DANCE WORKS: $14k → 9%SPOTLITE DANCE STUDIO: $11k → 9%MILELE ACADEMY: $27k → 14%MILELE ACADEMY: $13k → 14%TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $56k → 11%CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $49k → 11%CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $19k → 11%CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $14k → 11%CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $13k → 11%LORI GEIST: $22k → 11%CLARKSVILLE MAGIC: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IN
OH
KY
AZ
AR
TN
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 37 repeat orgs$334k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
31

Total granted

$2.0M
$231k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+30%

Still filing today

16%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $151k · revenue +52%
  • PC
    PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $49k · revenue +22%
  • TN
    TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TN-MARTIN
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • RH
    ROCKVALVE HIGH SCHOOL CHEER
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
2
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
3
Clear Creek Baptist Bible College Inc

Private Baptist College

—
4
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
5
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
6
Tusculum University

Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…

Education
7
Christendom Educational Corporation

Provide a catholic liberal arts education at the undergraduate and graduate levels.

Education
8
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
9
Cumberland University

The mission of cumberland university is to provide a personalized, high-quality, value-based educational experience that equips learners to lead, serve, and excel in an ever-evolving world.

—
10
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
11
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
12
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trevecca Nazarene University; the most unlike its peers is Cumberland Baseball Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $228,599 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TN KNOXVILLE: $179,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TN KNOXVILLEIndividual grant recipient: $179,225 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEF EDUCATIONAL TOURS: $123,390 · OtherEF EDUCATIONAL TOURSIndividual grant recipient: $122,119 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANCE WORKS: $120,197 · OtherDANCE WORKSIndividual grant recipient: $76,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $76,237 · Other+62 more: $906,656 · Other+62 moreCLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $151,143 · EducationCLARKSVILLE A…PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $48,708 · EducationPENSACOLA CHR…TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $28,900 · EducationTREVECCA NAZA…DAVIDSON ACADEMY: $17,300 · EducationDAVIDSON ACAD…BETHEL UNIVERSITY: $15,610 · EducationBETHEL UNIVER…+4 more: $23,600 · Education+4 moreTENNESSEE SOCCER CLUB INC: $9,635 · Youth DevelopmentCUMBERLAND BASEBALL CLUB: $6,200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,012,273Education$285,261Youth Development$9,635Recreation & Sports$6,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLARKSVILLE ACADEMY: $151,143 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $48,708 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $28,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $28,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIDSON ACADEMY: $17,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY: $15,610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHarding University Inc: $10,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE SOCCER CLUB INC: $9,635 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE: $6,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontessori Academy Incorporated: $6,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUMBERLAND BASEBALL CLUB: $6,200 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetLYON COLLEGE: $5,414 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $5,086 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DAVIDSON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dreamchasers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dreamchasers. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pensacola Christian College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dreamchasers’ filings →

More from the funding graph