Skip to content

· Private foundation

Drapkin California Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$192kHealth$130kEducation$100kScience & Tech$70kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$16kEmployment$13kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANOPY$15,000
LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$15,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$13,000
GAMBLE GARDEN$5,000
FILOLI CENTER$5,000
COLBY SAWYER COLLEGE$3,000
KENYON PARENTS FUND$1,000
SEMPERVIRENS FUND$1,000
ABILITY PATH$1,000
AVENIDAS$1,000
WELL TRAINED HORSES$1,000
COMMITTEE FOR GREEN FOOTHILLS$1,000
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%AVENIDAS: $5k → 8%AVENIDAS: $5k → 8%AVENIDAS: $1k → 8%AVENIDAS: $1k → 8%AVENIDAS: $1k → 8%AVENIDAS: $1k → 8%AVENIDAS: $1k → 8%AVENIDAS: $1k → 8%ABILITIES UNITED: $2k → 8%ABILITIES UNITED: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$506k · 20 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
1

Total granted

$506k
$3k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    Canopy
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +190%
  • EF
    ELIZABETH F GAMBLE GARDEN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +45%
  • FC
    FILOLI CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • PA
    PALO ALTO PARTNERS FOR EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
2
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
3
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
4
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment
5
Save the Redwoods League

Save the redwoods league protects and restores redwood forests and connects people with their peace and beauty so these wonders of the natural world flourish.

Environment
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Epacenter

Epacenter's mission is to increase opportunities for youth to discover and amplify their talents, realize their potential, and impact the world through art, design, and technology.

Arts & Culture
10
Santa Catalina Island Conservancy

The catalina island conservancy protects and stewards 88% of catalina island. more than 42,000 acres of wildlands, coves and coastal habitats. founded to preserve the island's natural resources, the conservancy advances a mission rooted in…

—
11
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
12
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Filoli Center; the most unlike its peers is Well Trained Horses. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $130,000 · OtherLUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITALMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $70,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYCOMMITTEE FOR GREEN FOOTHILLS: $18,500 · OtherCOMMITTEE FOR GREEN FOOTHILLSIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · Other+6 more: $26,000 · Other+6 moreCanopy: $135,000 · EnvironmentCanopyELIZABETH F GAMBLE GARDEN: $20,000 · EnvironmentELIZABETH F GAMBLE GARDENSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $11,000 · EnvironmentSEMPERVIRENS FUNDPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $7,000 · EnvironmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $58,000 · EducationMassachusetts Ins…Colby-Sawyer College: $19,000 · EducationColby-Sawyer Coll…PALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $10,000 · EducationPALO ALTO PARTNER…AVENIDAS: $16,000 · Human ServicesABILITYPATH HOUSING: $4,000 · Human ServicesFILOLI CENTER: $14,000 · Arts & CultureABILITYPATH: $13,000 · EmploymentWELL TRAINED HORSES: $2,000 · Animals
Other$258,000Environment$173,000Education$87,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$14,000Employment$13,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCanopy: $135,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $58,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH F GAMBLE GARDEN: $20,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetColby-Sawyer College: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAVENIDAS: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFILOLI CENTER: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYPATH: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYPATH HOUSING: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELL TRAINED HORSES: $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Canopy ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH F GAMBLE GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗
  • Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
  • Who funds FILOLI CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYPATH ↗
  • Who funds SEMPERVIRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds PALO ALTO PARTNERS IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYPATH HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds WELL TRAINED HORSES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Ara & Edma Dumanian Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Drapkin California Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Drapkin California Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Drapkin California’s filings →

More from the funding graph