Skip to content
Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Animals$258kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$2k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$37,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER JUPITER$37,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEWBORN KITTEN RESCUE: $2k → 11%CHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $2k → 11%NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR ABANDONED A: $2k → 8%REHOBOTH ANIMAL ADVOCATES: $2k → 11%UNBREAKABULL PITBULL RESCUE OF MN: $2k → 11%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%MEOOWZ RES Q: $2k → 10%SECOND CHANCE COCKER RESCUE: $2k → 14%YORKIE RESCUE OF AMERICA: $2k → 14%AUSTIN PETS ALIVE: $2k → 10%10TH LIFE SURG CENTER: $2k → 12%BEAUMONT PETS ALIVE: $2k → 19%ACTION PROGRAMS FOR ANIMALS: $2k → 23%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER JUPITER: $38k → 11%PAW WARRIORS INC: $2k → 12%HAPPY TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE: $2k → 13%BOXER AID AND RESCUE COALITION: $2k → 19%FUR FUN RESCUE: $2k → 8%3RD COAST LABRADOR RESCUE: $2k → 17%PAWSITIVE TAILS DOG RESCUE: $2k → 14%THE LOST COMPANION: $3k → 15%ANIMAL SHELTER ALLI OF RHEA: $2k → 14%WEST TENNESSEE SPAY NEUTER COALITIO: $2k → 15%PAWS FOR LIFE NC: $2k → 11%DOUGLAS COUNTY HS: $2k → 10%TLC HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 12%MY SECOND HOME RESCUE: $2k → 9%BOUNCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $2k → 11%EASTERN PLAINS ANIMAL WELFARE: $2k → 11%THE ANIMAL INTEREST LEAGUE & SANCT: $2k → 15%ANIMAL RESCUE OF SOUTHERN COLORADO: $2k → 18%PAWS & PRAYERS INC: $2k → 13%GREATER GOODS CHARITIES: $5k → 9%MARY'S NEONATE KITTENS: $2k → 11%HOPESTON ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $2k → 17%ONE STEP CLOSER ANIMAL RESCUE: $2k → 6%PURRFECT ANGELS CAT RESCUE INC: $2k → 12%RESCUES UNLIMITED: $2k → 16%PORT CITY CAT RESCUE: $2k → 13%JEFFERSON SPCA: $5k → 15%SCHNAUZER RESCUE OF LOUISIANA: $2k → 23%PEOPLE & PETS TOGETHER: $2k → 11%COALITION OF RESCUERS & ANIMAL LOVE: $2k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER JUPITER: $38k → 11%GREYHOUNDS IN MOTION: $2k → 13%PAWS & PRAYERS INC: $2k → 13%LOUISIANA SPCA: $5k → 23%HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER JUPITER: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 5 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
105

Total granted

$100k
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+30%

Still filing today

60%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PAWS AND PRAYERS INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +0%
  • PW
    PAW WARRIORS INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +22%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • LS
    LOUISIANA SPCA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • GG
    GREATER GOOD CHARITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • TJ
    THE JEFFERSON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
3
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
4
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
5
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
6
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
7
Peppy Pet Rescue

rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need

Animals
8
Forgotten Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Saving dogs

Animals
9
Phelps County Animal Rescue

provide shelter and care for dogs and cats

Animals
10
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
11
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
12
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cats Alive Slv. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/72
Grantees still filing
50/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER JUPITER: $87,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER JUPITER+42 more: $68,425 · Other+42 moreTHE JEFFERSON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND PRAYERS INC: $4,000 · Animals+63 more: $92,975 · Animals+63 moreGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $5,000 · PhilanthropyPROJECT POOCH: $1,125 · Crime & Legal
Other$155,925Animals$101,975Philanthropy$5,000Crime & Legal$1,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEFFERSON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS AND PRAYERS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPAW WARRIORS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetADOPT A GOLDEN BIRMINGHAM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetANIMAL BALANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOMERSET PULASKI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPort City Cat Rescue: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPAWS FOR LIFE NC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetONE STEP CLOSER ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHERD U NEEDED A HOME RESCUE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLAUREL CATS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSECOND CHANCE COCKER RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEOW MISSION INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBEAUMONT PETS ALIVE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHERISHED TAILS SENIOR SANCTUARY: $1,510 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAnimal Justice League: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOUNCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACTION PROGRAM FOR ANIMALS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMEOOWZRESQ INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $1,490 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWESTFIELD HOMELESS CAT PROJECT: $1,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHERN STATES RESCUED ROTTWEILERS: $1,400 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLOOKING GLASS ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFENCES FOR FIDO: $1,125 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCitizens for Animals of Midland Odessa Inc: $1,125 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGUNNAR'S WHEELS FOUNDATION: $1,125 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOPERATION TOPCAT: $1,125 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetANIMAL LIFE SAVERS INC: $1,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetR U 4 ME PET RESCUE INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANDYS CATS INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFUZZ BALL ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,100 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSADIES SAFE HARBOR CANINE RESCUE INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBEST FRIENDS SANCTUARY INC: $1,100 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHART COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetB A R C HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PANHANDLE PET SAVERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP COCKER RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE-A-HEARTBEAT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHAVEN HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHIMPERS TO WAGS RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALL ABOUT ANIMALS RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petsmart Charities IncPedigree FoundationBISSELL Pet FoundationPetco LoveThe Duffield Family F…Leslie L Alexander Fo…Greater Good CharitiesBest Friends Animal S…The Summerlee Foundat…Healthy Paws Foundati…Paypal Charitable Giv…Humane World for Anim…
Petsmart Charities IncAZ33.5× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petsmart Charities Inc · Pedigree Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Petco Love · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Greater Good Charities · Best Friends Animal Society · The Summerlee Foundation · Healthy Paws Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Humane World for Animals Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    16get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dr Jane's Healthypetnet’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home