Skip to content
Doylestown Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Doylestown Hospital

The mission of DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL is to continuously improve the quality of life and proactively advocate for the health and well being of the individuals we serve- see schedule o for additional information.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$715kArts & Culture$103kCommunity Improvement$42kHuman Services$37k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $107,595, the rows itemized in this filing. The $138,487 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,892 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$17,885
Median grant
2
States reached
$402M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF PHILADELPHIA$45,210
BUCKS COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP$22,000
CENTRAL BUCKS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$17,885
MSH PRODUCTIONS LLC$12,500
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $21k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 6%CENTRAL BUCKS FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$858k · 10 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$858k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+80%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2018–2025 · $275k · revenue +19%
  • AS
    ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $162k · revenue +48%
  • BC
    BUCKS COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS
    5× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • CC
    CRANE COMMUNICATIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LV
    LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bucks County Medical Society

The bucks county medical society strives to advance the professional and personal development of its physician members by providing educational and practice related resources as well as legislative advocacy. moreover, the bucks county…

—
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
6
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
7
Lehigh Valley Physician Group

Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health education, injury prevention, and…

Health
8
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the strategic plan is to position lancaster county businesses to thrive. by…

—
9
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
Schuylkill Health System Medical Group Inc

Establish and maintain a medical group consisting of clinicians employed by lehigh valley health network, part of jefferson health. this medical group will fulfill the charitable mission of promoting community health through health…

—
12
Berks Counseling Center Inc

Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bucks County Health Improvement Partners; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $274,989 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIAANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $162,000 · HealthANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICBUCKS COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS: $122,000 · HealthBUCKS COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $27,500 · Health+2 more: $39,002 · Health+2 moreHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $90,000 · OtherHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMEN…CENTRAL BUCKS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $41,935 · OtherCENTRAL BUCKS CHAMBER …MSH PRODUCTIONS LLC: $27,500 · OtherMSH PRODUCTIONS LLCCRANE COMMUNICATIONS: $20,000 · OtherCRANE COMMUNICATIONSBUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $55,000 · Arts & CultureRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $37,429 · Human Services
Health$625,491Other$179,435Arts & Culture$55,000Human Services$37,429

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $274,989 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $162,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS: $122,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetHEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $55,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCENTRAL BUCKS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $41,935 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $37,429 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $19,002 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundations Community…Penn Community Bank F…The Philadelphia Foun…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Foundations Community PartnershipPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · Penn Community Bank Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doylestown Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doylestown Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doylestown Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home