Skip to content

· Private foundation

Downing Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$265k
Granted FY2026still arriving
20
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$508kEducation$469kHuman Services$51kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $226k
$11,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Holy Spirit Center$40,000
St Anthony Church$30,000
John Paul the Great University$25,000
Archbishop Moeller High School$21,000
Sacred Heart Radio$20,000
St Philomena Apostolate$20,000
Good Shephard School$20,000
St Patricks School$17,000
Pregnancy Center East$11,500
St Cecilia School$11,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Serenelli Project$5,000
St Pauls Outreach$5,000
Franciscan Daughters of Mary$5,000
Sisters of Life$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Pregnancy Center East: $12k → 16%Pregnancy Center East Inc: $11k → 16%Pregnancy Center East Inc: $10k → 16%Pregnancy Center Plus: $10k → 16%Pregnancy Center East Inc: $10k → 16%Pregnancy Center East Inc: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 25 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+123%

Still filing today

28%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
ReligionEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SACRED HEART RADIO INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $120k · revenue +32%
  • JP
    John Paul The Great Catholic University
    5× · 2022–2026 · $105k · revenue +9%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $63k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CECILIA R C CHURCH
    one grant, 2025 · $24k
  • OS
    Old St Mary Church
    one grant, 2025 · $20k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paulist Press Inc

The Paulist Press was founded to provide Catholic literature and resources for the the religious use of parishes, institutions, individuals and other religious bodies to further the educational and mission goals of the Christian faith and…

—
2
Menlough Study Center Inc

The mission of the Menlough Study Center Inc is to provide moral intellectual and cultural formation consistant with Judea Christian principles and in cooperation with Opus Dei a personal prelature of the Catholic Church.

Religion
3
Pro Ecclesia Sancta of California

The foundation was organized to promote spiritual formation and priesthood vocations for the catholic church.

Religion
4
San Damiano College for the Trades

Post-secondary religious formation. San Damiano College for the Trades operates one program the House of Formation Program, which focuses on theology and spiritual formation for students working in the trades.

—
5
Saint Gabriel Communications Ltd

Operation of a radio station to service as a ministry

Religion
6
Saint Paul Vi Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction Inc

To pursue the development of morally and professionally acceptable reproductive health services.

—
7
Sacred Heart Radio Inc

The mission of sacred heart radio inc is to provide catholic radio programing and broadcasting in the pacific northwest.

Religion
8
Patris Corde Hermitage

Patris corde hermitage (the organization) is organized for charitable, religious, and educational purposes. the name patris corde is latin for: with a father's heart. the organization will offer a space for people to visit to strengthen…

Religion
9
St Padre Pio Institute of Rochester Inc

Religious purposes - promote devotion to st padre pio through creation of a chapel and other religious activities that are approved by the diocese of rochester related to padre pio and to the tenets of the roman catholic church

Religion
10
All Catholic Studios

Our mission is to lead people to an encounter with christ by tapping into the mobile-social-tech communications revolution and growth of digital media

Religion
11
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
12
Magnificat Foundation Inc

To promote expressions of faith, prayer, and devotion consistent with the magisterium and authoritative moral guidance of the catholic church, and to raise and provide financing and sponsorship of conferences, conventions, publications,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Damascus Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Center Plus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Cecillia School: $173,000 · OtherSt Cecillia SchoolOur Lady of Holy Spirit Center: $136,000 · OtherOur Lady of Holy Spirit CenterSt Patrick School: $93,000 · OtherSt Patrick SchoolHoly Spirit Center: $83,000 · OtherHoly Spirit CenterArchbishop Moeller High School: $66,000 · OtherArchbishop Moeller High SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Anthony Church: $50,000 · OtherSt Lawrence School: $50,000 · OtherST PHILOMENAS APOSTOLATE: $40,000 · OtherSt Patricks School: $35,000 · Other+18 more: $171,000 · Other+18 moreJohn Paul The Great Catholic University: $105,000 · EducationJohn Paul Th…St Edmund Campion Academy Inc: $45,000 · EducationSt Edmund Ca…SACRED HEART RADIO INC: $120,000 · ReligionSACRED HEA…SERENELLI PROJECT INC: $10,000 · ReligionSERENELLI …PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $62,500 · Human ServicesDAMASCUS INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentANGELICO PROJECT A CENTER FOR THOUGHT AND CULTURE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureProject Sycamore A Nfp Corporation: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$957,000Education$150,000Religion$130,000Human Services$62,500Youth Development$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSACRED HEART RADIO INC: $120,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetJohn Paul The Great Catholic University: $105,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $62,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSt Edmund Campion Academy Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetDAMASCUS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANGELICO PROJECT A CENTER FOR THOUGHT AND CULTURE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSERENELLI PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SACRED HEART RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds John Paul The Great Catholic University ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds St Edmund Campion Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAMASCUS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELICO PROJECT A CENTER FOR THOUGHT AND CULTURE ↗
  • Who funds SERENELLI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Sycamore A Nfp Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Dayton Foundation Depository · Bob & Felicia Burger Family Foundation · The Heidt Family Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Columbus Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Downing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Downing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Downing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph