Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dowd Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.1MAnimals$945kPhilanthropy$330kCommunity Improvement$130kHealth$87kEducation$74kPublic Benefit$60kYouth Development$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $825k
$27,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GALLATIN ICE FOUNDATION$525,000
CHASE ANIMAL RESCUE SANCTUARY$300,000
VILLAGE OF BIRCHWOOD WI$50,000
EAGLE MOUNT BOZEMAN$50,000
YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$27,500
SPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
MIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHAMPTON$25,000
THE BILLY POOLE FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $20k → 23%TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $10k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
MA
PA
DE
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 19 repeat orgs$446k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$2.3M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+65%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHASE ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $945k · revenue +237% · 92% of their budget
  • EM
    Eagle Mount
    4× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +225%
  • TG
    TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • M6
    MT 64 HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • AL
    ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visit Big Sky

As the community's official destination management and marketing organization, visit big sky leads the development and promotion of authentic tourism experiences through research and stakeholder collaboration to grow big sky's economy…

Community Improvement
2
Big Sky Ski Education Foundation

Big Sky Ski Education Foundation offers competitive Alpine, Freeride, and Nordic skiing programs.

—
3
Sky Foundation Inc

Sky Foundation, Inc. is dedicated to raising awareness and funding research for the early detection of pancreatic cancer.

Health
4
Big Sky Resort Association Inc

Serving as the voice of business, the big sky chamber of commerce champions a healthy economy and works collaboratively with community stakeholders as a conveyor and a catalyst to improve the overall quality of life in the region.

—
5
Montana Amateur Sports Inc Dba Big Sky State Games

Montana amateur sports, inc. is a non-profit organization established in billings, mt. it was established to provide quality competitions and programs that inspire healthy and active lifestyles for all ages and abilities. these events…

Recreation & Sports
6
Big Sky Care Connect

The purposes of the corporation shall be specifically to operate a statewide coordinated health information exchange and related services to enhance clinical care in the community and to improve and promote public health care in the…

Health
7
Silverfork Skimo Foundation

None

Recreation & Sports
8
United States Ski Team Foundation

Operates for the benefit and support of world-class skiing and snowboarding, including coaching and training athletes in these sports.

Recreation & Sports
9
Team Breckenridge Sports Club Inc

It is our mission to provide this community with an athletic environment that allows each athlete to reach their potential and pursue their life's goals through through snow sports.

Recreation & Sports
10
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
11
Greater Wyoming Big Brothers Big Sisters

To provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

—
12
United States Skiing Foundation

United states skiing foundation is engaged in not-for-profit membership, competition, training, development, and educational activities related to amateur skiers and snowboarders who are, or aspire to become, members of the u.s. ski and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Police Athletic League of Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHASE ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY INC: $945,000 · AnimalsCHASE ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY I…GALLATIN ICE FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 · PhilanthropyGALLATIN ICE FOUNDATION INCYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $152,500 · PhilanthropyYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUN…Eagle Mount: $110,000 · PhilanthropyEagle Mount+1 more: $25,000 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…MT 64 HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · OtherMT 64 HOCKEY ASSOCIATION …BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT PTO: $61,700 · OtherBIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT P…MIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHAMPTON: $50,000 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHAM…VILLAGE OF BIRCHWOOD WI: $50,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF BIRCHWOOD WIALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+22 more: $194,200 · Other+22 moreBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $360,000 · EnvironmentBIG SKY COMMU…SPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $129,825 · Community ImprovementBIG SKY SKATING & HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Miracle League of Joliet: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human Services
Animals$945,000Philanthropy$837,500Other$680,900Environment$360,000Community Improvement$129,825Recreation & Sports$70,000Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHASE ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY INC: $945,000 over 3y, 92% of budgetGALLATIN ICE FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $360,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $152,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $129,825 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetEagle Mount: $110,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBIG SKY SKATING & HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $55,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Miracle League of Joliet: $15,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BIG SKY COUNTRY: $13,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIG SKY BRAVERY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHASE ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN ICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Mount ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY SKATING & HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Miracle League of Joliet ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BIG SKY COUNTRY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY BRAVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR AUTISM AND NEURODIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Police Athletic League Of Philadelphia ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moonlight Community FoundationMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moonlight Community Foundation · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · One Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dowd Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dowd Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dowd Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dowd Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dowd Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph