Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dove Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$645k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$515k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$955kEducation$401kHuman Services$155kHealth$106kFood & Nutrition$50kHousing & Shelter$45kRecreation & Sports$25kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $515k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION$515,000
MARYMOUNT HERMITAGE$100,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$12,248
MORAN CENTER$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$6,113
MONASTERY OF THE ASCENSION$1,000
COME AND SEE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $20k → 15%THE CABIN: $25k → 8%SACRED HEART RANCH OF IDAHO: $10k → 11%MONASTERY OF THE ASCENSION: $2k → 12%MARYMOUNT HERMITAGE: $100k → 12%ISU FOUNDATOIN: $100k → 13%PROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INC: $85k → 10%CHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION: $515k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF IOWAS CENTER FOR ADVA: $100k → 15%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 9%ST MARY'S OF THE ROSARY: $1k → 13%MORAN CENTER: $10k → 14%US GIVING TO MAHER INC: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY 0F ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%HOLY APOSTELS MERIDIAN: $8k → 8%MONASTERY OF THE ASCENSION: $1k → 12%ST ISIDORE FARM: $5k → 12%PROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INC: $65k → 10%CHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION: $104k → 17%COME AND SEE FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%MORAN CENTER: $30k → 14%THE CABIN: $5k → 8%MONASTERY OF THE ASCENSION: $1k → 12%PROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INC: $46k → 10%MORAN CENTER: $30k → 14%HOLY APOSTELS MERIDIAN: $5k → 8%MORAN CENTER: $25k → 14%HOLY APOSTLES MERIDIAN: $1k → 8%MORAN CENTER: $20k → 14%ST PAULS CATHOLIC CENTER: $20k → 8%MORAN CENTER: $20k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $6k → 8%MORAN CENTER: $20k → 14%CAMP RIVER RUN: $20k → 8%OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY: $500 → 8%CAMP RIVER RUN: $5k → 8%ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE: $5k → 8%ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE: $5k → 8%ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BOISE: $5k → 8%ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BOISE: $5k → 8%SALT AND LIGHT RADIO: $2k → 8%ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BOISE: $1k → 8%IDAHO AEYC: $90k → 8%BOISE STATE PUBLIC RADIO: $1k → 8%IDAHO AEYC: $45k → 8%BOISE STATE PUBLIC RADIO: $500 → 8%BISHOP KELLY HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 8%BKHS FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
ID
IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
AZ
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$406k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +404% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$1.5M
$287k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+404%
-2%

Still filing today

15%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    CHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $619k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $225k
  • PO
    PROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $196k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWAS CENTER FOR ADVA
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SP
    ST PAULS CATHOLIC CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Solid Rock Youth Ranch dba Rock of Hope Ministries

We provide apartments for young ladies who have aged out of the orphanage system in Romania. We also feed widows and provide wood for heating during the winter. We help single mothers with their children

International
2
Himalayan Joy Home

Provide a safe and loving home for unwanted girls in northern India, along with quality education

Human Services
3
Daughters of Mary Mother of Healing Love

Bring the healing love of God to families and individuals through a variety of apostolates.

Human Services
4
Don Orione Nursing Home Sons of Divine Providence Inc

The organization's mission is to establish and maintain homes for the aged and for the needy. (the assets were sold in 2019 to an unrelated party. no activity for 2020.)

—
5
Casa de Paz

Casa de Paz provides a shelter for women and their children who are subject to domestic abuse. The goal is to permit the women to get on their feet and be able to support themselves and their children.

Human Services
6
Children of Faith Missions

To provide poor and underpriviledged children with a safe place that fulfills their need for food, clothing, shelter, health care, education, and Christian love.

Human Services
7
Daya Inc

Daya empowers survivors of domestic and sexual violence through services such as counseling, transitional housing, translation and interpretation, legal advocacy, and financial support, and educates the community to end the cycle of abuse.…

Community Improvement
8
Catholic Daughters of the Americas

Provides aid to homes for elderly and catholic dioceses

—
9
Ruah Retreat At the River
Religion
10
Emh Recovery Inc

To provide residential treatment for women with chemical dependency problems and their families.

Health
11
Asha Rising

Charitable

Housing & Shelter
12
Recoverychick

religious

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Us Giving to Maher. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION: $619,030 · OtherCHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONPROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INC: $195,720 · OtherPROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INCMORAN CENTER: $155,000 · OtherMORAN CENTERMarymount Hermitage Inc: $100,000 · OtherMarymount Hermitage IncIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF IOWAS CENTER FOR ADVA: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWAS CENTER FOR ADVA+19 more: $180,965 · Other+19 moreIdaho Association for the Education of Young Children: $135,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $10,000 · EducationCAMP RIVER RUN INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCompassion International Incorporated: $12,248 · InternationalUS GIVING TO MAHER: $5,000 · InternationalSACRED HEART RANCH OF IDAHO: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDOROTHY DAY PLACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterSalt & Light Radio Inc: $2,000 · Religion
Other$1,675,715Education$145,000Recreation & Sports$25,000International$17,248Housing & Shelter$15,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIdaho Association for the Education of Young Children: $135,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMarymount Hermitage Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCAMP RIVER RUN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetSACRED HEART RANCH OF IDAHO: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS GIVING TO MAHER: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSalt & Light Radio Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
  • Who funds Marymount Hermitage Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RIVER RUN INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART RANCH OF IDAHO ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DOROTHY DAY PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds US GIVING TO MAHER ↗
  • Who funds Salt & Light Radio Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dove Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dove Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dove’s filings →

    More from the funding graph