· Private foundation
Dove Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $515k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION | $515,000 |
| MARYMOUNT HERMITAGE | $100,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $12,248 |
| MORAN CENTER | $10,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $6,113 |
| MONASTERY OF THE ASCENSION | $1,000 |
| COME AND SEE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +404% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CYCHAPEL YORK US FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $619k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $225k
- POPROVINCE OF THE HOLY NAME INC3× · 2021–2023 · $196k
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF IOWAS CENTER FOR ADVAone grant, 2022 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $100k
- SPST PAULS CATHOLIC CENTERone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide apartments for young ladies who have aged out of the orphanage system in Romania. We also feed widows and provide wood for heating during the winter. We help single mothers with their children
Provide a safe and loving home for unwanted girls in northern India, along with quality education
Bring the healing love of God to families and individuals through a variety of apostolates.
The organization's mission is to establish and maintain homes for the aged and for the needy. (the assets were sold in 2019 to an unrelated party. no activity for 2020.)
Casa de Paz provides a shelter for women and their children who are subject to domestic abuse. The goal is to permit the women to get on their feet and be able to support themselves and their children.
To provide poor and underpriviledged children with a safe place that fulfills their need for food, clothing, shelter, health care, education, and Christian love.
Daya empowers survivors of domestic and sexual violence through services such as counseling, transitional housing, translation and interpretation, legal advocacy, and financial support, and educates the community to end the cycle of abuse.…
Provides aid to homes for elderly and catholic dioceses
To provide residential treatment for women with chemical dependency problems and their families.
Charitable
religious
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Us Giving to Maher. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
- Who funds Marymount Hermitage Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP RIVER RUN INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART RANCH OF IDAHO ↗
- Who funds DOROTHY DAY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds US GIVING TO MAHER ↗
- Who funds Salt & Light Radio Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dove Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.