Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglas L and Kathy J Kool Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$197kReligion$75kHealth$74kEducation$50kInternational$48kCivil Rights$9kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$55,000
EXALTA HEALTH$30,000
SAFE HAVEN$20,000
HOLLAND HOME$20,000
ICCF$15,000
CROSSROADS PRISON MINISTRIES$12,000
WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES$11,500
Individual grant recipient$11,111
GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$7,000
OPERATION MOBILIZATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FAMILY PROMISE$5,000
ALL BELONG$2,500
CORD GROUP$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOLLAND HOME: $20k → 11%HOLLAND HOME: $10k → 11%HOLLAND HOME: $10k → 11%HOLLAND HOME: $1k → 11%CITY IMPACT: $2k → 11%CITY IMPACT: $2k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $12k → 11%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$648k · 24 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
17

Total granted

$648k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-16%

Still filing today

42%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES
    5× · 2018–2024 · $73k · revenue +28%
  • HH
    Holland Home
    4× · 2018–2024 · $41k · revenue +49%
  • WC
    WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $32k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • CR
    CAMP ROGER
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
2
But God Ministries

Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…

International
3
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
4
Christian Resources International

Free worldwide distribution of christian literature

Religion
5
The Wellspring Group

Wellspring provides a discipleship model for individuals and churches to engage as a part of their overall spiritual development. this is done through retreat and small group experiences and through equipping churches and organizations to…

Religion
6
Christ Counseling Ministry Inc

To offer clinically trained professionals devoted to restoring lives to wholeness through christ centered counseling, teaching and prayer.

Religion
7
Kingdom Global Ministries

Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.

Religion
8
Brooklink Inc

Brooklink's mission is to equip global christian leaders to fulfull jesus' great commission.

—
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Presbyterian Reformed Ministries International

Exalting jesus christ igniting the church in the power of the holy spirit under the authority of the holy bible as the word of god through prayer, leadership development, growing the church, and mission outreach so that the church may be…

Religion
11
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
12
Faithworks Christians in Mission

Faithworks unites the christian community in mission ministry including construction, medical and children's ministry projects. outreach includes 12 mission projects yearly with volunteer missioners participating.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Intervention Services; the most unlike its peers is Branch Interfaith Hospitality Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $107,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFE HAVEN: $95,000 · OtherSAFE HAVENICCF: $45,000 · OtherICCFGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $40,000 · OtherGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INCIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCALVIN SEMINARY: $30,000 · OtherCALVIN SEMINARYCROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES: $23,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,111 · Other+23 more: $110,450 · Other+23 moreHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $73,000 · HealthHEALTH INT…Holland Home: $41,000 · Human ServicesHolland H…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $16,500 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD …CITY IMPACT: $4,000 · Human ServicesCITY IMPA…GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $40,000 · EducationALL BELONG: $10,000 · EducationFRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES: $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 · InternationalCAMP ROGER: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsBranch Interfaith Hospitality Network: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCORD GROUP: $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$534,811Health$73,000Human Services$61,500Education$50,000International$22,250Recreation & Sports$5,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $73,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetHolland Home: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES: $23,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL BELONG: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP ROGER: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY IMPACT: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORD GROUP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Holland Home ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CROSS ROAD CORRECTIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALL BELONG ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ROGER ↗
  • Who funds Branch Interfaith Hospitality Network ↗
  • Who funds CITY IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORD GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barnabas FoundationIL21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barnabas Foundation · Douglas & Maria Devos Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Marion & Marlene Betten Foundation · Steve & Amy Van Andel Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas L and Kathy J Kool Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas L and Kathy J Kool Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Douglas L and Kathy J Kool’s filings →

    More from the funding graph