Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglas & Allison Frey Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$776k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$518k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$1.3MEducation$319kEnvironment$230kPublic Benefit$100kReligion$30kHuman Services$20kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
  • $250k+1 grant · $518k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUCKS UNLIMITED$517,800
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION$75,000
AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
COMMUNITY FIRST$25,000
CRANE TRUST$25,000
GIPS FOUNDATION$20,400
ST THERESA'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
THE RISE SCHOOL OF HOUSTON$6,000
ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC PREP$5,000
ARMSTRONG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,973
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MATT TALBOT KITCHEN OUTREACH: $10k → 13%MATT TALBOT KITCHEN OUTREACH: $5k → 13%MATT TALBOT KITCHEN OUTREACH: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
NY
SD
NE
VA
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 16 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
31

Total granted

$2.5M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+44%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $165k · revenue +10%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $75k · revenue +46%
  • MT
    MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • PR
    PLATTE RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTS INgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +87%
  • PR
    PLATTE RIVER BASIN ENVIROMENTS - PRBE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
3
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
4
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
5
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
6
Texas Foundation for Conservation

Fish and wildlife conservation and outreach including public awareness. Fifteen public relations campaign on social media with over 7.5 million impressions. Twenty plus speaking engagements to a variety of conservation organizations…

Animals
7
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
8
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
9
Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc
—
10
Caesar Kleberg Foundation for Wildlife Conservation
—
11
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
12
Gulf Fishery Research Foundation
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Lederhausen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUCKS UNLIMITED: $1,730,978 · OtherDUCKS UNLIMITEDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $105,000 · Other+37 more: $444,775 · Other+37 moreRISE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $155,000 · EducationRISE SCHO…GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $65,600 · EducationGRAND ISL…Texas A&M Foundation: $12,500 · Education+2 more: $2,977 · EducationTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $165,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentPLATTE RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTS IN: $25,000 · EnvironmentNEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Lederhausen Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $106 · Health
Other$2,280,753Education$236,077Public Benefit$165,000Environment$105,000Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Animals$1,000Health$106

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRISE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $155,000 over 5y, 93% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $105,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $65,600 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPLATTE RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTS IN: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lederhausen Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAFFRON TRUST WOMENS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $1,977 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL CITY A&M FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RISE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATION COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLATTE RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTS IN ↗
  • Who funds MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Lederhausen Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFFRON TRUST WOMENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas & Allison Frey Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas & Allison Frey Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Douglas & Allison Frey Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Douglas & Allison Frey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Douglas & Allison Frey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph