Skip to content

· Private foundation

Doug and Karen Marlow Family Foundation

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$9kReligion$9kInternational$7kHealth$4kEducation$2kHousing & Shelter$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kPhilanthropy$560Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,024
Median grant
2
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Malibu Pacific Church$1,024
Compassion International$344
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Union Rescue Mission: $620 → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $527 → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $469 → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $256 → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $100 → 14%Union Rescue Mission: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20k · 6 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$20k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+78%

Still filing today

67%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • S2
    STEP 2 INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue +84%
  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $2k · revenue +155%

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Hope
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +79%
  • MF
    MALIBU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
5
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
6
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
10
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is St Jude Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Hope: $8,333 · OtherCity of HopeMALIBU PACIFIC CHURCH: $7,849 · OtherMALIBU PACIFIC CHURCHMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $3,015 · OtherMending Kids International dba Mending KidsSTEP 2 INC: $2,500 · OtherSTEP 2 INCMalibu Pacific Church: $1,024 · Other+10 more: $2,120 · Other+10 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $3,536 · InternationalCompassion I…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $250 · InternationalINTERNATIONA…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,300 · EducationUNION RESCUE MISSION: $2,072 · Human ServicesMALIBU FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNF2 BIOSOLUTIONS: $716 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $200 · HealthST JUDE HOSPITAL: $60 · HealthPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $210 · PhilanthropyCITY TO CITY SOCAL: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$24,841International$3,786Education$2,300Human Services$2,072Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Health$976Philanthropy$310

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $3,536 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $3,015 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTEP 2 INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $2,072 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMALIBU FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNF2 BIOSOLUTIONS: $716 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY TO CITY SOCAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE HOSPITAL: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids ↗
  • Who funds STEP 2 INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MALIBU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NF2 BIOSOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds CITY TO CITY SOCAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doug and Karen Marlow Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doug and Karen Marlow Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Doug and Karen Marlow Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Doug and Karen Marlow Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doug and Karen Marlow Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph