Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy H Krahm Charitable Fdn In

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$460k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$574kEducation$57kHealth$38kHousing & Shelter$37kEmployment$20kInternational$16kEnvironment$12kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $310k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$210k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SEMINARY$100,000
SISTERS SERVANTS OF THE ETERNAL WOR$60,000
FRANCISCAN MISSIONARIES OF THE ETER$50,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$50,000
SISTERS OF LIFE$50,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$20,000
MIRAVIA$20,000
DAUGHTERS OF THE VIRGIN MOTHER$20,000
MISSIONARIES OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST$20,000
NICOLAS CENTER AUTISM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON VA$10,000
OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MONASTERY$10,000
MERCURY ONE$10,000
THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%NEW GROUND: $1k → 6%NEW GROUND: $500 → 6%NEW GROUND: $5k → 6%NEW GROUND: $4k → 6%NEW GROUND: $3k → 6%NEW GROUND: $1k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $2k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $1k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $1k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
KY
VA
MD
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 19 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$494k
$34k

Still filing today

26%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalEducationReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +392%
  • SD
    SPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20k · revenue +504%
  • NG
    New Ground Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • PF
    PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF ST PETER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • SS
    SISTER SERVANTS OFTHE ETERNAL WORLD
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MC
    MONTFORT CHILDREN OF MARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
4
Mark and Martha Slaughter Family Foundation Inc
Science & Tech
5
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
The Margareten Family Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
Sargeants Army
Human Services
10
Lungevity Foundation Inc

Lungevity's vision is a world where no one dies of lung cancer. lungevity foundation is firmly committed to making an immediate impact on increasing quality-of-life and survivorship of people with lung cancer by accelerating research into…

Health
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
The Paul and Mareva Marciano Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SISTERS SERVANTS OF THE ETERNAL WOR: $170,000 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE ETERNAL WOROUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SEMINARY: $100,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SEMINARYFRANCISCAN MISSIONARIES OF THE ETER: $87,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN MISSIONARIES OF THE ETERSISTERS OF LIFE: $50,000 · OtherSISTERS OF LIFECHRIST THE KING MONASTERY: $40,000 · OtherCHRIST THE KING MONASTERYMISSIONARIES OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST: $22,000 · Other+25 more: $170,940 · Other+25 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $55,092 · EducationNew Ground Inc: $16,880 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5,010 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD: $20,091 · EmploymentMIRAVIA INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterMercury One Inc: $10,000 · InternationalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,500 · Religion
Other$639,940Education$55,092Human Services$31,890Employment$20,091Housing & Shelter$20,000International$10,000Religion$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $55,092 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD: $20,091 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMIRAVIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNew Ground Inc: $16,880 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5,010 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds MIRAVIA INC ↗
  • Who funds New Ground Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy H Krahm Charitable Fdn In funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy H Krahm Charitable Fdn In. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy H Krahm Charitable Fdn In’s filings →

    More from the funding graph