Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy and Lee Roy Parks Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$186kHealth$159kCommunity Improvement$159kPhilanthropy$159kEducation$39kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k7 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES$16,965
DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS$16,965
MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP$16,965
Individual grant recipient$16,965
Individual grant recipient$16,965
Individual grant recipient$16,965
SHRINERS BURN CENTER$3,000
CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,500
KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY$500
AUSTIN COLLEGE$330
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $21k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $21k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $21k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $21k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $21k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $21k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $18k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $18k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $18k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $18k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $18k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $18k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $18k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $18k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $18k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $18k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $17k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $17k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $17k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $17k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $17k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $17k → 13%DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE LIONS: $17k → 13%CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $17k → 13%DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $17k → 10%MILTONVALE SENIOR CITIZENS: $17k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 16 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-23%
0%

Still filing today

19%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DL
    DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $176k · revenue -23% · 99% of their budget
  • MC
    MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP
    10× · 2017–2026 · $176k
  • DS
    DELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS
    10× · 2017–2026 · $176k

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTH CENTRAL KANSAS TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    one grant, 2025 · $670 · revenue 0%
  • CC
    CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS
    one grant, 2025 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bethany Lutheran College Inc

Bethany lutheran college provides christian higher education in a challenging academic environment where personal mentoring guides students to pursue knowledge, truth, and discernment for productive and fulfilling lives.

Education
2
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

—
3
Lyon College

Lyon college offers a liberal arts education of superior quality in a personalized setting. a selective, independent, undergraduate, residential teaching and learning community affiliated with the presbyterian church (usa). lyon encourages…

Education
4
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
5
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
6
Carthage College

Seeking truth, building strength, inspiring service - together

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Southwestern Christian College

Its purpose is to offer a holistic educational program that will motivate the student to value and achieve academi excellence within the context of commitment to moral and spiritual values.

Education
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
11
Asbury College

Asbury university equips students, through academic excellence and spiritual vitality, for lifelong learning, leadership, and service to the professions, society, the family and the church, preparing them to engage their cultures and…

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Christian College of Kansas; the most unlike its peers is Claude & Mabel Childs Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILTONVALE CLINIC CORP: $176,134 · OtherMILTONVALE CLINIC CORPDELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENS: $176,134 · OtherDELPHOS SENIOR CITIZENSIndividual grant recipient: $176,134 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $176,134 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $159,169 · OtherCLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST+16 more: $82,715 · Other+16 moreDELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $176,134 · Community ImprovementDELPHOS LIONS CHA…KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $670 · EducationCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $500 · EducationBETHEL COLLEGE: $500 · EducationSTERLING COLLEGE: $500 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGE: $500 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGE: $330 · Education
Other$946,420Community Improvement$176,134Education$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $176,134 over 10y, 99% of budgetCLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST: $159,169 over 9y, 99% of budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $670 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DELPHOS LIONS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAUDE & MABEL CHILDS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STERLING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kansas Independent College AssociationKS15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Independent College Association · The Pete Henry Foundation · Rose Spurrier Scholarship Fund · Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Earl Bane Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy and Lee Roy Parks Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy and Lee Roy Parks Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy and Lee Roy Parks’ filings →

    More from the funding graph