Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy and Henry Hwang Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$246k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$251kReligion$64kArts & Culture$37kHealth$4kInternational$4kAnimals$1kHousing & Shelter$300Human Services$300
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$246,346
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLAIREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY$246,346
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $300 → 14%GLOBAL DREAMBUILDERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 9 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

$95k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-11%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $246k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHAMBER MUSIC AMERICA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +5%
  • EP
    EAST-WEST PLAYERS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • PH
    Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • FE
    FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF GLENDALE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AP
    AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -28%
  • OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
2
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
9
American University of Armenia Corporation

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
12
National University

To deliver accessible world-class student experiences by providing quality programs and services that ensure student success through meaningful learning. to be an inclusive and innovative university serving life-long learners who…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us; the most unlike its peers is Serving Foundation International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Claremont Graduate University: $246,346 · EducationClaremont Graduate University+1 more: $5,000 · EducationFIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH ASSOCIATION: $27,000 · OtherFIRST EVANGELICAL CH…EPICENTRE CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherEPICENTRE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF GLENDALE: $10,000 · OtherFIRST EVANGELICAL CH…J BRUSHWORKS MINISTRY: $5,200 · OtherJ BRUSHWORKS MINISTR…+4 more: $3,600 · Other+4 moreYELLOW BARN INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOW BARN…CHAMBER MUSIC AMERICA INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUS…EAST-WEST PLAYERS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEAST-WEST P…Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $4,000 · HealthOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $2,000 · InternationalGLOBAL DREAMBUILDERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $300 · Human Services
Education$251,346Other$65,800Arts & Culture$37,000Health$4,000International$2,000Human Services$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClaremont Graduate University: $246,346 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYELLOW BARN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEAST-WEST PLAYERS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL DREAMBUILDERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cj Huang Family FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cj Huang Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy and Henry Hwang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy and Henry Hwang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dorothy and Henry Hwang Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dorothy and Henry Hwang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy and Henry Hwang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph