Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorotha a Anderson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$124kHuman Services$89kEducation$86kRecreation & Sports$55kPhilanthropy$31kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$17kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$857k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZION'S REFORMED UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$10,000
BAUGHMAN COMMUNITY RECREATION OF NORTHERN PA$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE MANOR$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PA & EAS$5,000
ST PAUL'S HOME$5,000
THIEL COLLEGE$5,000
GREENVILLE SALVATION ARMY$3,000
COMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE$2,000
UNITED WAY OF MERCER COUNTY$1,500
GREENVILLE SYMPHONY$1,500
CRAWFORD COUNTY UNITED WAY$1,000
LEGACIES ALIVE$1,000
STRAYHAVEN ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
MEADVILLE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
THE GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEGACIES ALIVE: $1k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%WILLOW WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 13%LEGACIES ALIVE: $1k → 10%LEGACIES ALIVE: $1k → 10%ST PAUL HOMES: $10k → 13%ST PAUL HOMES: $10k → 13%ST PAUL HOMES: $10k → 13%ST PAUL HOMES: $5k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $5k → 13%ST PAUL'S HOME: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 29 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
14

Total granted

$395k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-12%

Still filing today

34%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PAUL HOMES
    6× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +1%
  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FOR HOPE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • MU
    MOUNT UNION UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • GA
    GREENVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • GF
    GREENVILLE FAST PITCH SOFTBALL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
2
United Way of Westchester and Putnam

United way of westchester and putnam mobilizes strategic partnerships and leverages resources to create a more equitable community by advancing education, financial stability, and health initiatives.

Human Services
3
United Way of Wayne and Holmes Co

In order to mobilize community resources to help people measurably improve their lives - we work collaboratively with our community to identify priorities, and then decide which strategies, dollars, and partnerships should be used to bring…

Philanthropy
4
Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc

The mission of Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries (Goodwill) is to help individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency to achieve independence and dignity through work. Not charity, but a chance.

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
6
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
7
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
8
United Way of Wilkes County Inc

United way of wilkes county is dedicated to improving the lives of our citizens by underwriting identified programs that enhance their well-being through our 21 partner agencies. the united way of wilkes county annually impacts over 32,000…

Philanthropy
9
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
10
United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc

The uwmpc enhances the quality of life in our community by helping those in need. we serve as a leader in building a stronger and healthier community by developing resources and creating partnerships to empower individuals to improve their…

Philanthropy
11
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
12
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Willow Womens Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZION'S UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $108,000 · OtherZION'S UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION - OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION - OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENTCOMMUNITY RECREATION OF NORTHER MERCER: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RECREATION OF NORTHER MERCERBAUGHMAN COMMUNITY RECREATION OF NORTHER: $20,000 · OtherBAUGHMAN COMMUNITY RECREATION OF NORTHERGREENVILLE SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · Other+34 more: $143,100 · Other+34 moreST PAUL HOMES: $45,000 · Human ServicesST PAUL HOME…LEGACIES ALIVE: $3,000 · Human ServicesLEGACIES ALI…+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Mount Union: $20,000 · EducationTHIEL COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCORNERSTONE FOR HOPE: $15,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF MERCER COUNTY: $9,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND EASTERN OHIO: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE WESBURY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyInspiring Minds: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$341,100Human Services$50,000Education$30,000Health$15,000Philanthropy$15,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST PAUL HOMES: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE FOR HOPE: $15,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHIEL COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MERCER COUNTY: $9,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAWARE INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInspiring Minds: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStrayhaven Animal Shelter Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WESBURY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWillow Womens Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST PAUL HOMES ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THIEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MERCER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND EASTERN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds AWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Inspiring Minds ↗
  • Who funds LEGACIES ALIVE ↗
  • Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds Strayhaven Animal Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WESBURY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern OhioPA21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Buhl Regional Health Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorotha a Anderson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorotha a Anderson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dorotha a Anderson Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dorotha a Anderson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dorotha a Anderson’s filings →

More from the funding graph