Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Doris M Lamb and H Richard Lamb Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2019
15
Grants FY2019
7
States reached
$235k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Health$493kArts & Culture$18kHousing & Shelter$4kEducation$3kRecreation & Sports$2kAnimals$700Civil Rights$700Public Benefit$500Other$0
02FY2019 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k14 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $235k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER$235,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD - PASADENA AND SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$8,000
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$5,000
UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES$2,966
YALE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$1,500
SOUTH PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FUND$1,000
SOUTH PASADENA HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB$1,000
THE INTEGRATED RECOVERY NETWORK$1,000
SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY$500
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO$500
US OLYMPIC COMMITTEE$500
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$500
THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY$500
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$500
CM RUSSELL MUSEUM$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE INTEGRATED RECOVERY NETWORK: $1k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$506k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$506k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+103%

Still filing today

70%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $485k · revenue +65%
  • Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +17%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $900 · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +103%
  • US
    UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +158%
  • SP
    SOUTH PASADENA HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
The Paley Center for Media

Description of organization mission: the paley center for media is the premier institution dedicated to advancing the understanding of media-it's artistic value, social impact and historical importance-for the public and media…

Arts & Culture
4
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
5
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
10
Henry George School of Social Science

Our mission is (1) informing the public and policymakers about the analytical framework and policy reforms proposed by the pioneering late-19th century u.s. economist henry george; and (2) explaining how his ground-breaking formula for…

Education
11
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER — $485,000 · HealthTREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER+1 more — $8,000 · HealthColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $900 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $700 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH PASADENA HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB — $1,000 · OtherSOUTH PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherUS OLYMPIC COMMITTEE — $900 · OtherCM RUSSELL MUSEUM — $700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $400 · OtherUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $2,966 · Human ServicesINTEGRATED RECOVERY NETWORK — $1,000 · Human ServicesYale University — $1,700 · EducationBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC — $700 · EducationSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $700 · AnimalsTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 · Public Benefit
Health$493,000Arts & Culture$17,600Other$4,000Human Services$3,966Education$2,400Animals$700Public Benefit$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTREATMENT ADVOCACY CENTER — $485,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $2,966 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRATED RECOVERY NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH PASADENA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC — $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Doris M Lamb and H Richard Lamb Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Yale University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Doris M Lamb and H Richard Lamb Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Doris M Lamb and H Richard Lamb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph