Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Doris Burwell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0140% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Human Services$14kArts & Culture$14kEducation$11kCommunity Improvement$8kReligion$7kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2kMembership Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$779k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
t$21,000
g$5,000
h$3,000
m$2,500
f$2,500
V$2,500
Jr League of Huntsville$2,500
f$1,500
h$1,500
r$1,000
h$1,000
j$1,000
w$1,000
f$1,000
l$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%First Stop: $3k → 11%Enable Madison County: $500 → 11%SECOND MILE DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 11%NEXT STEP FARMS: $2k → 11%FIRST STOP: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 13 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
22

Total granted

$141k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+39%

Still filing today

15%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    t
    3× · 2022–2024 · $62k
  • H
    h
    3× · 2022–2024 · $22k
  • F
    f
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k

Funded once

  • BM
    BURRITT MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • ML
    M LOUIS SALMON LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • B
    b
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathway Home of the Finger Lakes in

To provide residential living arrangements and care for the terminally ill, helping them prepare for death in their final days of life.

Human Services
2
Aim Home Health Agency Inc

Caring for the terminally ill by managing patient comfort and pain either in the patient's home, nursing home or assisted care facility

3
Huntsville Emergency Medical Services Inc

To provide emergency medical services to the general public and contract ambulance services.

4
Hunterdon Helpline Inc

Provide a live 24 hour initial assistance call center that receives, responds to, follows up and documents requests for assistance, providing information, referrals advocacy and care

Health
5
Hospice of Limestone County

Provide counseling, nursing, transportation, and other services as needed to terminally ill patients and their families. patients are recommended by physicians, and pay only if they have insurance.

6
South Baldwin County Healthcare Authority

None

7
Hospital Hospitality House Corporation

Our mission is to be a home away from home for patients and caregivers seeking medical treatment in nashville hospitals by providing lodging, meals, and other supportive services.

Health
8
Hospice of Humboldt Inc

Offers a new hope for comfortable,peaceful and dignified end of life while focusing on patient's goals and wishes at all times.

Human Services
9
White Mountain Hospice Foundation Inc

Providing care and services for terminally ill patients and their families.

Philanthropy
10
Hudson Health Services Inc

To enrich the mind, body and spirit by providing evidenced based clinical care and recovery support services.

Health
11
Steppingstone Museum Association Inc

Steppingstone farm museum preserves and interprets the rural heritage of harford county.

Arts & Culture
12
Huntington County Humane Society Inc

The huntington county humane society exists to protect and provide shelter for animals and to encourage the humane treatment of all animals in huntington county.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Junior League of Huntsville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smile a While Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

t — $62,250 · Otherth — $21,600 · OtherhBURRITT MUSEUM — $12,000 · OtherBURRITT MUSEUMf — $10,000 · Otherfg — $8,250 · Otherm — $7,500 · Other+22 more — $49,000 · Other+22 moreTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF HUNTSVILLE INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementFirst Stop Inc — $4,900 · Human ServicesNEXT STEP FARMS — $1,500 · Human ServicesSECOND MILE DEVELOPMENT INC — $500 · Human ServicesCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY — $500 · Human ServicesFREE 2 TEACH FOUNDATION — $4,125 · EducationHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION — $1,500 · EducationTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC — $1,500 · HealthSmile A While Inc — $750 · HealthMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE — $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$170,600Community Improvement$7,500Human Services$7,400Education$5,625Health$2,250Arts & Culture$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF HUNTSVILLE INC — $7,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFirst Stop Inc — $4,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFREE 2 TEACH FOUNDATION — $4,125 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT STEP FARMS — $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmile A While Inc — $750 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF HUNTSVILLE INC
  • Who funds First Stop Inc
  • Who funds FREE 2 TEACH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSEUM BOARD OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE
  • Who funds NEXT STEP FARMS
  • Who funds THE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Smile A While Inc
  • Who funds SECOND MILE DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING AND HOMEBOUND OF MADISON COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Alpha Foundation · The Jane K Lowe Charitable Foundation · Wallace E Kirkpatrick Family Foundation · John a Jurenko Et Al Foundation · The Beard-Young Family Foundation · The I3 Cares Foundation · Parker Griffith Family Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Doris Burwell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Doris Burwell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Doris Burwell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph