Skip to content
Dora & Louis Fox Charitable Trust 10015000 at a glance

· Private foundation

Dora & Louis Fox Charitable Trust 10015000

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$144kCrime & Legal$62kPhilanthropy$56kArts & Culture$48kHuman Services$37kEducation$30kRecreation & Sports$21kCivil Rights$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR JEWISH PHILANTHROPY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$338k · 12 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$338k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+59%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +13%
  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $31k · revenue +1%
  • TF
    THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GKC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • TH
    THE HEARD MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +100%
  • CP
    CHILD'S PLAY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
2
American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona

To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.

—
3
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
4
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
6
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
7
American Association of Museums

Champion equitable and impactful museums by connecting people, fostering learning and community, and nurturing museum excellence.

Arts & Culture
8
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
9
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
10
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
11
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
12
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Child's Play. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR JEWISH PHILANTHROPY: $50,000 · OtherCENTER FOR JEWISH PHILANTHROPYCHILD'S PLAY: $21,000 · OtherCHILD'S PLAYKEHILATH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE: $18,000 · OtherKEHILATH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GKC: $15,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GKCJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $7,300 · OtherArizona Jewish Historical Society: $6,600 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF: $6,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $15,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE I…DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $3,500 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $48,200 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & R…National Kidney Foundation Inc: $31,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundat…CHILD'S PLAY: $10,043 · HealthCHILD'S PLAYEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $61,800 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR G…ANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $51,000 · PhilanthropyANTHONY RIZZO…CHILDSPLAY INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDSPLAY…THE HEARD MUSEUM: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HEARD …THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $18,500 · Civil Rights
Other$147,400Health$89,243Crime & Legal$61,800Philanthropy$51,000Arts & Culture$41,000Education$30,000Civil Rights$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $61,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $48,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDSPLAY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $18,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD'S PLAY: $10,043 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArizona Jewish Historical Society: $6,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express Foun…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Express FoundationNY13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dora & Louis Fox Charitable Trust 10015000 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dora & Louis Fox Charitable Trust 10015000. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dora & Louis Fox Charitable Trust 10015000’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home