Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dooley Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Education$7kReligion$5kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$1kHousing & Shelter$902Health$457Animals$200Civil Rights$102Other$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$107
Median grant
8
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST HEDWIG THREE HOLY WOMEN PARISH$2,550
PILLOWS WITH WINGS INC$2,500
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HS$1,000
PIUS XI HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
ST VIATOR HIGH SCHOOL$600
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$500
DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE$500
STREET ANGELS$250
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$250
JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY$250
ST ALPHONSUS$250
KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$150
LUPUS FOUNDATION$107
CLEARBROOK$100
COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLEARBROOK: $100 → 14%PILLOWS WITH WINGS INC: $1k → 5%CLEARBROOK: $100 → 14%PILLOWS WITH WINGS INC: $3k → 5%SERENITY INNS: $100 → 17%SERENITY INNS: $100 → 17%STREET ANGELS: $250 → 17%STREET ANGELS: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
OH
KY
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18k · 19 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$18k
$810

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $457 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STREET ANGELS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500 · revenue +24%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200 · revenue +7%
  • C
    CLEARBROOK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200 · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $180
  • M
    MADACC
    one grant, 2024 · $102
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR CAFE-ST JOHN'S CATHEDRAL
    one grant, 2024 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
3
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
4
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
9
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
10
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Street Angels Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Dynamic Catholic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST HEDWIG THREE HOLY WOMEN PARISH — $3,350 · OtherST HEDWIG THREE HOLY WOMEN PARISHPIUS XI HIGH SCHOOL — $2,160 · OtherPIUS XI HIGH SCHOOLMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HS — $2,105 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HSSAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOOL — $1,100 · OtherSAINT VIATOR HIGH SCHOOLST ALPHONSUS — $500 · Other+18 more — $2,369 · Other+18 morePILLOWS WITH WINGS INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesPILLOWS WITH WINGS INCSTREET ANGELS INC — $500 · Human ServicesSTREET ANGELS INCSERENITY INNS INC — $200 · Human ServicesCLEARBROOK — $200 · Human ServicesXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationXAVIER UN…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $513 · EducationSTEPHEN S…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $100 · EducationHILLSDALE…THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE — $750 · ReligionJUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC — $350 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC — $200 · Food & NutritionALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 · Health
Other$11,584Human Services$4,400Education$1,613Religion$750Food & Nutrition$550Health$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPILLOWS WITH WINGS INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $513 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERENITY INNS INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PILLOWS WITH WINGS INC
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STREET ANGELS INC
  • Who funds JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds SERENITY INNS INC
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dooley Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph