Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donna and Steven Aptekar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$209kHealth$191kHuman Services$27kReligion$9kEducation$9kFood & Nutrition$8kArts & Culture$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$65,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$10,000
BOCA RIO FOUNDATION$7,500
SWEET DREAM MAKERS$5,000
BOCA HELPING HANDS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$1,101
GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,040
AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION$1,030
MITCHELL COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOOSE FLIGHTS INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CT
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 20 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$339k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+27%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BOCA RIO FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +155%
  • SD
    Sweet Dream Makers Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +113%
  • BR
    Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $21k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • GF
    GOOSE FLIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +10%
  • AB
    AF BEST SECURITIES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Foundation Fighting Blindness Retinal Degeneration Fund

The foundation fighting blindness retinal degeneration fund's mission is to accelerate the translation of retinal laboratory-based research into clinical trials to expedite the commercialization of patient therapies.

Health
5
Cancer Research and Treatment Fund Inc

Cancer research and treatment fund,inc.(cr&t) funds research emphasizing the cause,prevention,treatment,and cure of myeloproliferative neoplasms(mpns)and alsofunds other blood and solid tumor cancer research.

—
6
Brca Foundation

The primary mission is to accelerate research and foster collaboration to prevent and cure brca cancers. we invest in the most promising work of top scientific investigators while creating a forum for successful partnerships across…

—
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
Alcides E Rosaura Diniz Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…

—
9
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOCA REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $155,000 · OtherBOCA REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONJAFCO: $24,656 · OtherJAFCOIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OCEAN REEF INC: $9,000 · Other+14 more: $20,429 · Other+14 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY…BOCA RIO FOUNDATION INC: $47,150 · PhilanthropyBOCA RIO FOUNDATION INCSweet Dream Makers Inc: $21,036 · PhilanthropySweet Dream Makers Inc+1 more: $1,030 · PhilanthropyBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $21,000 · HealthOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $5,088 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $1,800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $275 · HealthTIKVA CORP: $15,000 · EducationMITCHELL COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $8,000 · Food & NutritionGOOSE FLIGHTS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$219,085Philanthropy$179,216Health$29,663Education$19,000Food & Nutrition$8,000Human Services$3,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $110,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA RIO FOUNDATION INC: $47,150 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetSweet Dream Makers Inc: $21,036 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $5,088 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL COLLEGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $3,040 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOSE FLIGHTS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAF BEST SECURITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $1,030 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelping Israel Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOCA RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sweet Dream Makers Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE SNOW SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOSE FLIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds AF BEST SECURITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds Helping Israel Fund ↗
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Martin B Greenberg Foundation IncNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Martin B Greenberg Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donna and Steven Aptekar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donna and Steven Aptekar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Mitchell College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donna and Steven Aptekar Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph