Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donlan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$229k
Granted FY2019
37
Grants FY2019
8
States reached
$59k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

66% of Donlan Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Lincoln Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 14 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Donlan Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 26 organizations, $229k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

22
’17
23
’18
26
’19
11
’20
10
’21
16
’22
11
’23
15
’24
14
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$839kRecreation & Sports$663kHealth$529kEnvironment$434kEducation$255kHuman Services$148kArts & Culture$81kAnimals$29kOther$0
02FY2019 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k30 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN PARKS FOUNDATION$58,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$40,000
VOICES OF HOPE$35,000
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$20,000
MADONNA FOUNDATION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND$10,000
MOURNING HOPE GRIEF CENTER$10,000
NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
FOLLOW YOUR DREAMS$5,000
LINCOLN LITERACY$3,720
FRIENDSHIP HOME$2,500
GIRL SCOUTS - SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA$2,500
SALVATION ARMY OF LINCOLN$2,500
FRESH STARTINC$2,500
LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 41 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2019, 10 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
19

Total granted

$1.7M
$271k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

73%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MADONNA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $309k · revenue +87%
  • LL
    LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $179k · revenue +322%
  • NW
    NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CI
    CENTERPOINTE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -10%
  • TS
    THE SOLIDAGO CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2025 · $50k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
2
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
3
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
4
Urban League of Nebraska

The mission of the urban league of nebraska is to be an empowering voice in the community advocating for economic self-reliance, parity, power, civil rights and equal opportunity for all (see schedule o). the vision of the urban league of…

Human Services
5
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
6
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
7
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
8
Aclu Nebraska

For over 50 years in nebraska, the aclu has worked in courts, legislatures, and communities to protect the constitutional and individual rights of all people. with a nationwide network of offices and millions of members and supporters,…

—
9
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
10
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
11
Lincoln Land Community College Foundation

Cultivating and stewarding charitable gifts to support lincoln land community college students, programs and services.

Philanthropy
12
Nebraska State Bar Association

The mission of the nebraska state bar association (nsba) is "helping lawyers help people." the nebraska state bar association works for nebraska lawyers to help them achieve the highest standards of competence, ethics and professionalism…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Lincoln; the most unlike its peers is Minnesouri Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
33/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINCOLN PARKS FOUNDATION: $649,500 · OtherLINCOLN PARKS FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $330,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYVOICES OF HOPE: $98,500 · OtherVOICES OF HOPE+33 more: $229,703 · Other+33 moreLincoln Community Foundation Inc: $818,700 · PhilanthropyLincoln Community Foundation IncTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $309,260 · PhilanthropyTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION+1 more: $3,500 · PhilanthropyLINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL: $178,595 · EducationLINCOLN L…NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $71,000 · EducationNEBRASKA …+3 more: $7,000 · EducationCENTERPOINTE INC: $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $30,000 · HealthHOPESPOKE: $30,000 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthAUDUBON OF KANSAS INC: $54,050 · EnvironmentTHE SOLIDAGO CONSERVANCY: $50,000 · EnvironmentWichita Art Museum Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $16,000 · Arts & CultureBONE CREEK ART MUSEUM: $11,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMOURNING HOPE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $6,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $3,800 · Arts & CultureWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $35,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $3,500 · Human Services
Other$1,307,703Philanthropy$1,131,460Education$256,595Health$162,000Environment$104,050Arts & Culture$77,300Human Services$38,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLincoln Community Foundation Inc: $818,700 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $330,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MADONNA FOUNDATION: $309,260 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetLINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL: $178,595 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetCENTERPOINTE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $71,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUDUBON OF KANSAS INC: $54,050 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $35,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPESPOKE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $24,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $21,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOLLOW YOUR DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $18,230 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetLUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $16,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NE INC: $13,500 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetWOODS TENNIS AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $13,323 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBONE CREEK ART MUSEUM: $11,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOURNING HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUST ASSOCIATES INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIORS FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT LIGHTS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF LINCOLN: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMINNESOURI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetNEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LINCOLN CITY LIBRARIES: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA ART ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $1,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH START INC: $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lincoln Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE MADONNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CENTERPOINTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AUDUBON OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOLIDAGO CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPESPOKE ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOLLOW YOUR DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODS TENNIS AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds BONE CREEK ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MOURNING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds JUST ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART ↗
  • Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SENIORS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE57.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Cooper Foundation · Abel Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · United Way of Lincoln and Lancaster County · D F Dillon Foundation · James Stuart III Family Foundation · Kinder Porter Scott Family Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Lee and Debbie Stuart Family Foundation · Acklie Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donlan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donlan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Donlan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Donlan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donlan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph