Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donegan Burns Foundation Co Bettye Guerin Burns

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$421k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of DONEGAN BURNS FOUNDATION CO BETTYE GUERIN BURNS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $230k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REINS$126,000
THERAPEUDIC RIDING OF TUCSON$104,000
SOAR THERAPEUTIC RIDING$37,900
Individual grant recipient$36,800
RAD$25,665
Divine Education Foundation$25,000
CONNECT MED$20,000
Military Officers Association of Am$15,000
FIRST TEE IMG Academy$15,000
TEE UP FOR THE TROOPS$10,000
FAITH AID$3,000
Maui Humane Society$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VETERANS LYFE SERVICES: $35k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
AR
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 43 repeat orgs$314k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
25

Total granted

$2.6M
$314k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+146%

Still filing today

26%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $413k · revenue +20%
  • SA
    SOAR ARENA THERAPEUTIC RIDING
    3× · 2022–2024 · $104k · revenue +4%
  • CI
    CONNECTMED INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $98k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • VL
    Veterans LYFE Services
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · 95% of their budget
  • RT
    RISE Therapeutic Equestrian Center
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • NT
    NDR THERAPEUTIC RIDINGgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +164%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Spirit Horse Ranch Inc

Our mission is to provide transformative equine-assisted therapy that foster trauma recovery, suicide prevention, and resilience building for individuals and communities.

Recreation & Sports
2
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
3
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
4
Impact Horse- Connecting Humans and Horses
Animals
5
Adaptive Riding Institute Dba Horses of Hope Oregon

Our mission is to enhance the lives of individuals living with physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral challenges by providing innovative, accessible and safe equine-assisted therapeutic programs of the highest quality. we are…

Animals
6
First Nature Foundation Inc Kerul Kassel

At first nature foundation, our mission is to help program participants grow their emotional resilience, self-confidence, and self-awareness, by partnering with nature and our wise herd of horses, who help facilitate these outcomes. at our…

Human Services
7
Horses in California

To bring strength and healing to children with special needs and the san francisco community through the love and care of horses; to encourage young people in compassion and leadership through volunteerism.

8
Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
9
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
10
Healing Strides of Virginia

To promote wellness for people with personal challenges who can benefit from equine-assisted activities and therapies in a safe and supportive environment.

11
Valor Healing Farms

Valor Healing Farms has been created to serve the military community including veterans, active duty, caregivers, families and first responders.Through farming internships, therapeutic horticulture, sustainable gardening, animal-assisted…

Public Benefit
12
Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc

We improve quality of life through equine-based therapy to physically, mentally and socially/emotionally challenged individuals. Our unique program integrates academic, social and physical skills using the horse as a catalyst.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of San Diego County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Gamma Sigma. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REINS — $478,120 · OtherREINSEWGA OF SAN ANTONIO TX — $162,000 · OtherEWGA OF SAN ANTONIO TXTEE UP FOR THE TROOPS — $85,000 · OtherRISE Therapeutic Equestrin Center — $79,135 · OtherFIRST TEE IMG Academy — $70,000 · Other+52 more — $1,124,874 · Other+52 moreTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $412,750 · Recreation & SportsTherapeutic Rid…SOAR ARENA THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $104,460 · HealthCONNECTMED INTERNATIONAL — $98,225 · HealthNDR THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $29,890 · HealthMAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $52,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $41,441 · EducationDEVINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationBoys & Girls Club of North County — $92,200 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $25,000 · InternationalFaith Aid — $8,000 · InternationalFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED — $6,900 · InternationalVeterans LYFE Services — $35,000 · Human Services
Other$1,999,129Recreation & Sports$412,750Health$232,575Education$128,691Youth Development$92,200International$39,900Human Services$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTherapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc — $412,750 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetSOAR ARENA THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $104,460 over 3y, 18% of budgetCONNECTMED INTERNATIONAL — $98,225 over 7y, 11% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of North County — $92,200 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetMAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $52,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPegasus Therapeutic Riding Academy Inc — $43,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $41,441 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEVINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetVeterans LYFE Services — $35,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetNDR THERAPEUTIC RIDING — $29,890 over 1y, 15% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFaith Aid — $8,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED — $6,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALPHA GAMMA SIGMA — $3,700 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc
  • Who funds SOAR ARENA THERAPEUTIC RIDING
  • Who funds CONNECTMED INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of North County
  • Who funds MAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY
  • Who funds Pegasus Therapeutic Riding Academy Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds DEVINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Veterans LYFE Services
  • Who funds NDR THERAPEUTIC RIDING
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donegan Burns Foundation Co Bettye Guerin Burns funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Donegan Burns Foundation Co Bettye Guerin Burns?

    Find your warmest path to Donegan Burns Foundation Co Bettye Guerin Burns through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph