· Public charity
Donate Life Foundation
To improve the quality of life for people affected by organ and tissue donation and transplantation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $2,390,702 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,244,587 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $853,885 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $681,130 |
| ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY | $496,774 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI CURATORS | $209,304 |
| EYE THRIVE | $100,000 |
| FAMILY HOSPICE OF BELLEVILLE AREA | $100,000 |
| BAPTIST MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ST LOUIS BREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE DBA ANNIE'S HOPE | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS | $100,000 |
| LOST & FOUND GRIEF CENTER | $100,000 |
| CASA DE SALUD | $99,664 |
| INFANT LOSS RESOURCES INC | $97,830 |
| GIFT OF LIFE | $67,500 |
| ST LOUIS REGIONAL HEALTH COMMISSION | $35,000 |
| GATEWAY REGIONAL YMCA | $35,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +76%- SLST LOUIS UNIVERSITY7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +16%
- LFLOST & FOUND8× · 2017–2024 · $778k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- MTMID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $4.1M · revenue +31%
- NBNEA BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEM INCone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +14%
- PPOWER4STLgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…
To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of God.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baptist Memorial Health Care Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Elizabeth's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Fr ancis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LOST & FOUND ↗
- Who funds THE ST LOUIS BEREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOSPICE OF BELLEVILLE AREA ↗
- Who funds CASA DE SALUD ↗
- Who funds INFANT LOSS RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds EYE THRIVE ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL- JONESBORO INC ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Advocates For a Healthy Community Inc ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEA BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds LESTER E COX MEDICAL CENTERS ↗
- Who funds THE DENTAL HEALTH THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds POWER4STL ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD ↗
- Who funds DONATE LIFE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds St Elizabeth's Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Fr ancis ↗
- Who funds St Bernards Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare · Centene Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · The Four Leaf Clover Foundation · Pecha Family Foundation · Regional Business Council · Jefferson Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Donate Life Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.