Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donald Levin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$8.7MReligion$3.9MHealth$3.4MInternational$3.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.1MAnimals$686kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $307k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.5M
$125,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$63M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Friends of Magen David Adom$1,050,000
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$1,000,000
PACC 911$600,000
Love Them All$350,000
President and Fellows of Harvard College$300,000
Mayo Clinic$250,000
Saving Paws Rescue AZ$125,000
Learn Charter School Network$76,633
Alone No More Dog Rescue Inc$55,000
Orphans of the Storm Animal Shelter$50,000
Cochise Canine Rescue$25,000
Chicago Filmmakers$25,000
Dogtree Pines Senior Pet Sanctuary$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mayo Clinic: $1.3M → 11%Alone No More Dog Rescue Inc: $55k → 11%Dogtree Pines Senior Pet Sanctuary: $25k → 14%Cochise Canine Rescue: $25k → 18%Help Hope Live: $50k → 6%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $1.0M → 8%Love Them All: $3.0M → 14%Teen Cancer America Inc: $9k → 14%American Support for Israel Inc: $115k → 17%Baptist Health System Foundation Inc: $25k → 14%Connecticut Public Broadcasting: $5k → 11%Wish For Our Heroes: $10k → 5%Back to Basics Project: $500 → 18%Mark-9: $20k → 7%Orphans of the Storm Animal Shelter: $50k → 8%The Chicago Community Foundation: $1.0M → 14%Food Allergy Research & Education: $100k → 6%Vegas Golden Knights Foundation: $100k → 13%Mayo Clinic: $250k → 11%Alone No More Dog Rescue Inc: $35k → 11%Cochise Canine Rescue: $15k → 18%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $350k → 8%Love Them All: $500k → 14%Orphans of the Storm: $15k → 8%Chicago Filmmakers: $25k → 14%Mayo Clinic: $125k → 11%Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health: $250k → 8%Love Them All: $350k → 14%ORPHANS OF THE STORM ANIMAL SHELTER: $10k → 8%American Friends of Magen David Adom: $1.1M → 14%ASU FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 11%ORPHANS OF THE STORM ANIMAL SHELTER: $5k → 8%The Department of Emergency Medicine at Loyola Uni: $100k → 14%ASU FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 11%American Friends of Magen David Adom: $1.0M → 14%PACC 911: $600k → 11%Garrido Stray Rescue Foundation: $5k → 14%PACC 911: $400k → 11%University of Chicago: $100k → 14%PACC 911: $238k → 11%Chicago Police Memorial Foundation: $25k → 14%PACC 911: $50k → 11%AMITA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%PACC 911: $30k → 11%Congregation Bene Shalom: $15k → 14%Learn Charter School Network: $129k → 14%Learn Charter School Network: $90k → 14%Learn Charter School Network: $77k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
CT
CA
VA
AZ
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 12 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$19M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2022 · $8.0M · revenue +125%
  • LE
    Lawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School
    3× · 2022–2025 · $296k · revenue +18%
  • OO
    ORPHANS OF THE STORM
    4× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $115k · revenue 0%
  • VG
    VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
2
Petfinder Foundation

To prevent the euthanasia of adoptable pets and support animal welfare groups to this end.

Animals
3
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
4
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
5
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
6
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Pets for Patriots Inc

The organization's mission is to transform the lives of veterans by helping them save an at risk shelter dog or cat, and to end all animal homelessness in the us and enrich the lives of men and women who serve, and have served our country.…

Animals
9
Dogs Playing for Life Inc

Dogs playing for life is redefining the meaning and importance of quality of life for all sheltered dogs by improving their experience through playgroups and individualized training, resulting in urgent and responsible livesaving.

Animals
10
Agr Foundation Inc

Serving the needs of all dogs and the people who love them.

Animals
11
Animal Friends Rescue Project

The Organization is dedicated to finding life-long loving homes for stray, abandoned and abused cats and dogs. The Organization concentrates on networking with other animal welfare agencies in the county and throughout the state to provide…

Human Services
12
Forever Loved Pet Sanctuary

To save senior dogs who are often overlooked by providing them the opportunity to thrive in a safe and caring environment.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cochise Canine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Government Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesFallen First Responder Supp…Cancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%17%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%3%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr15%29%20–35yr10%58%35–55yr12%7%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
16%
4,465/28,458

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $8,000,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A N…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $300,000 · EducationLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School — $295,633 · Education+1 more — $100,000 · EducationLove Them All — $3,850,000 · OtherLove Them AllMayo Clinic — $1,625,000 · OtherMayo ClinicPACC 911 — $1,318,000 · OtherPACC 911CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+12 more — $248,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,050,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEND…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,000,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE …LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $1,600,000 · Health+1 more — $50,000 · HealthSAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ — $425,000 · AnimalsALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE INC — $90,000 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORM — $80,000 · AnimalsCOCHISE CANINE RESCUE — $40,000 · Animals+2 more — $25,000 · AnimalsAMERICA GIVES INC — $115,000 · PhilanthropyVEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $100,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$8,695,633Other$8,041,000International$3,050,000Health$1,650,000Animals$660,000Philanthropy$215,000Food & Nutrition$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $8,000,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,050,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $1,600,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSAVING PAWS RESCUE AZ — $425,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School — $295,633 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $115,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALONE NO MORE DOG RESCUE INC — $90,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM — $80,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBaptist Health System Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChicago Filmmakers — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWISH FOR OUR HEROES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET GOTCHA DAY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donald Levin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Donald Levin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Donald Levin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph